So her exposing the perpetrators makes her less of a victim?
I kind of agree with the reasoning. She’s the symbol for everything wrong with Hollywood. She got exploited, was treated as a sex toy and didn’t have a say herself.
There might be more sensitive ways instead of removing the statue. They could educate people on the exploitation for example.
deleted by creator
When did giving trump the benefit of the doubt ever work?
It wasn’t even a dog whistle, it was a fog horn. There’s not much room for interpretion.
Mr dictator on day one obviously wants to stay a dictator.
Also Pi-Thagoras
They were given a grace period to ween off of the dependancy. Orban seems to have used that period to double down on Russian oil.
Now that period is over because they’ve shown they have no interest in getting away from Russian influence.
You don’t use all your jokers in the first hand played.
I never noticed he had no eye lashes. Is that common in people?
That’s Fair.
If they’re reporting government officials, they won’t even attempt to fuck it up, though. They need to keep their status as a trusted source for the government. So they keep it neutral and factual. There’s few better sources for this kind of stuff.
That’s why the Diddy-Classy video was sent to them by the feds.
Political commentary, yeah forget it, their commenters are in billionaires pockets.
CNN doesn’t donate but as your screenshot shows, it’s parent company Warner Brothers Discovery.
Here are their tiny political contributions:
https://wbd.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/WBD_Political_Contributions_June_30_2023.pdf
Maybe look into AT&T, but I already did and they watch out it’s 50:50.
Your screenshot (which I wouldn’t count a source without a link) seems to be wrong and way outdated, since it isn’t called Time Warner since 2018, but I suppose the data is way older.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB942887490446554182
Nov. 18, 1999 12:07 am ET
WASHINGTON – Time Warner Inc. said it would no longer make large contributions to political parties, unilaterally surrendering a major weapon that companies, unions and other interests use to lobby lawmakers.
The entertainment conglomerate is the biggest “soft money” donor so far to publicly forswear the practice. Time Warner and Timothy Boggs, its top lobbyist, donated $471,000 to national party committees in the last election cycle, and a like amount to various st
No, their donations are pretty much split 50:50 between republicans and Democrats.
You also can’t donate to CNN.
There’s some billionaires like Bezos that gave millions to political commenters directly, under the cover of philanthropic efforts, though.
CNN is biased, but they don’t outright lie when it comes to things like this.
How are they going to implement it, I guess by linking your identity to your porn-blockchain key.
I guess there’s no better way to track your habits.
Nah, you’re fine. You show qualities that a lot of moderators are lacking and are rightfully criticised for. You engage in discussion, are open to get your mind changed but don’t blindly follow anyone’s suggestion without wrapping your own mind around it.
I would gladly follow your lead if I would still be in the business of moderating.
It’s a learning process that will never stop, and everyone does mistakes. In moderation quite often because you have to make a lot of decisions in a short time.
What seperates a good mod is that they would acknowledge those mistakes and try to make it better next time.
I’m from Europe and I had to adjust my understanding what NSFW is to the US market. I would set the bar way lower myself in the beginning.
He lost his bearings.
Our whole capitalistic system is built around endless growth. That’s the reason population has to grow endlessly too.
It’s used for Internet purchases, so you don’t have to give your billing information some random site that might get hacked.
I still unfortunately order things from Amazon for the convenience
It turned out that it’s incredible easy to order as guest at other sides
I have the suspicion for a while that the people behind those new climate movements are paid by oil companies and others to make climate activists look bad, and shift the public opinion about climate action.
All the actions seem to deliberately targeted to anger the mainstream about them.
Making the naive climate activists at the front the tool of conglomerates.
I doubt he actually went himself.