Anarcho-DeLeonist with Juche Characteristics

  • 1 Post
  • 28 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: June 6th, 2026

help-circle


  • I’m having trouble seeing what the issue is with mechanistic materialism, particularly on the third point:

    That all motion, all change can be reduced to the mechanical interaction of the separate particles of matter;

    How is this not the most scientific/least metaphysical way to view the world? This sentence is the basis of all physics! I also saw a post a while ago saying that dialectical materialists “understand that consciousness is real” while “a mechanical materialist treats humans like passive objects, reduces consciousness to brain chemistry”. In this case, is the second statement really incorrect? To say otherwise would be reintroducing metaphysics, denying that neuroscience/psychology can describe the brain because of some supernatural force.