I’m not even saying Biden or Harris are holding Israel back. I’m saying Trump has openly stated that he wants to push Israel even further than it is already going.

Yes, you are repeatedly stating this while seemingly ignoring that Kamala and Biden are already doing genocide, because it doesn’t get worse than that. If Kamala isn’t stopping the genocide or even holding Israel back, how will Trump be worse? What could Trump possibly do that’s worse than genocide? “Finish the job” vs “finish the job faster”, either way the same result, genocide.

As I stated in my last message, if Trump gets in and starts directing Israel how to do the genocide and demands they do it faster, there’s a real chance his incompetence leads to its failure. Whereas under Kamala Biden it’s already been ongoing for over a year.

If we have to choose between “slow effective genocide” vs “fast sloppy genocide” I’m choosing the sloppy one. As it has the best chance of failing. (I don’t support this argument of choosing a “lesser genocide” though, just stating the flaws in your argument).

Considering you apparently didn’t read what I actually wrote and instead chose to insult me over something you made up

They most likely insulted you because they read what you wrote, the same reason I didn’t respond initially.

Your entire previous reply to me is ignoring context almost to the point of strawmanning and borderline genocide denial*. It comes off as someone who doesn’t actually care about the issue and just wants to get their talking points out about why genocidal Trump is bad and genocidal Democrats are good.

*edit for clarification: the “Trump would do it faster” is an echo of the “it’s not a genocide because they could destroy Palestine anytime and haven’t” form of denialism

To quote him: ““From the start, Harris has worked to tie Israel’s hand behind its back, demanding an immediate ceasefire, always demanding ceasefire”.

Okay? Do you usually treat what Trump says as gospel? …Do you think she got a ceasefire or successfully restrained Israels genocidal ambitions so far?

Materially, what is the difference between them.

“Genocide but sad” vs “Genocide and happy”, I’m not choosing Genocide period.

However bad things currently are, Trump’s openly-stated position that horrific situation is that Israel needs to go in harder.

Things are genocide, Harris’ openly stated positions are horrific and enabling of a genocide we have seen be carried out.

Kamala Harris is actively engaging in genocide and it’s worked for over a year, you’re engaging in hypotheticals on it getting worse based off Trump’s words. Perhaps Trump’s incompetence would even lead to a forced end to the genocide if we are engaging in hypotheticals, in fact, I’d wager thats much more likely than Harris suddenly switching from a genocider to a compassionate human being and ending it.

Because why would a pro-Palestine person vote for the person who has aided the genocide against them and continues to vow further support for the regime responsible?

The way I see it, the USA has a two party system and in the next few weeks they’re either going to have Trump or Harris as president, come inauguration day. With this in mind doesn’t it make sense to vote for the person least likely to escalate the situation even more.

How is Kamala less likely to escalate it further when she has supported the actual ongoing genocide? What will Trump escalate it to? Double genocide? Either way I’m not voting for Trump so I don’t have to agree with his policies. I’m just not going to let the Dems conduct Genocide and scare me into agreeance with them using the threat of Trump.

If you’re talking about escalation with Iran, we have already been working with Israel for a “response” to Iran response and she has again supported Israels right to continue their provocations in the name of “defense”.

Giving your vote to an independent or worse not voting at all, just gives more of a chance for Trump to win the election and then who knows what crazy stuff he will allow, or encourage, Israel to get away with.

Crazy stuff like genocide? Expanding the “war” in Gaza into Lebanon? Provoking Iran with a strike on their soil then planning “retaliation” for their retaliation?

As sure nobody wants to vote for a party allowing these heinous crimes to be committed, but given you’re getting one of them shouldn’t you be voting for the one that will be the least horrible of the two.

Kamala is actively engaged in a genocide. There should be punishments for this. The least of which should be losing your role in any sort of elected office. A vote for Kamala is literally a vote saying that you are okay with genocide as long as it benefits you to do so.

Amazing how someone will equate an imperfect country and THE genocidal slaveholder regime.

Nobody says China is perfect. We claim that the US and their allies have no right to criticize. It’s like the Nazis/Axis powers criticizing the USSR (or Sweden or whatever since you probably support and parrot Nazi propaganda against USSR)

You say this while America has the largest prison population in the world, filled with a large percentage of black men, who are used as slave labour and as America carries out a literal Genocide against Palestine.

China is infinitely better than the US on Muslim and minorities rights.

Every search engine ever is biased in the results it will show you.

You have to learn the biases and not fall prey to them.

If you think you’re using an unbiased source then all you’ve done is failed to recognize them.

Well, the US says they can still do that for the next 21 days before there will be any repurcussions (please ignore that this conveniently places it a week after the US election so they can comfortably do nothing)

At this point, the very few games that I am leaving behind are only the ones that use anticheat systems that do not work with linux, and I don’t think I’ll really miss letting a game company rootkit my macine

League of Legends continues to kill my hopes and dreams. Legitimately the only game I care about keeping access to and there’s no way vanguard works when it barely works on windows.

$1 + 50% tip = 1.50

“No matter how hard I try I cannot defeat the immortal science of Marxism Leninism!”

I imagine the naming of pineapple unironically was like

“Oi bruv this looks like a pinecone but i can eat it like an apple! It’s a Pine Apple innit!?”

If so, then here’s my opinion: If you own or manage a shop, bar, club, gym, etc., it’s reasonable to ban someone because they aren’t the sort of person you want in your establishment. Maybe they make you or your other customers uncomfortable.

I disagree with this specific aspect. I believe there should be reasons required to ban someone. Not just because you own the place and don’t want them in your place as they make you/other customers uncomfortable.

As you state above, we have had to add protections for certain groups in the past as this is literally the justification for segregation in the past. But it’s still relevant as it’s the reason homeless people (for example) en masse aren’t allowed in public places in the present, even if they’re good people who have done nothing wrong. We also see it being abused with the allowance of a few “good ones” from said protected class to avoid discrimination claims while still discriminating against the rest of said class.

So a .ML user posted a rant about bans, seemingly from real world establishments based on the wording, in a .ML group, and you felt it would make you seem normal to come in and take the opportunity to assume he was talking about .ML members being banned from other communities and to complain about .ML users?

Mirror.

“Skyrim? You mean stealth archer simulator?”