I’ve been using mailbox.org for a while, and I’m happy with it. It costs 1€ per month at it’s lowest. They have also been developing an open source video conferencing thing (included in the 1€), which from my experience is much better than jitsi.
they/them
I’ve been using mailbox.org for a while, and I’m happy with it. It costs 1€ per month at it’s lowest. They have also been developing an open source video conferencing thing (included in the 1€), which from my experience is much better than jitsi.
(It is possible to scan both of them)
I assumed Qwant had a small, primarily french index which was mixed with bing results. Their article mentions the new index will be based on existing qwant technologies. Do you have a link to where they admit to not having any index at all?
Maybe it’s a soy sauce situation. Bears are named after bears cave.
I’ve never tried having the app on multiple devices - I specifically didn’t want it on my phone - but it’s worth a try. I use whatsapp web in firefox, and only start waydroid when I need to log in again. The third party linux apps just load whatsapp web in electron or something.
Exactly. I created my whatsapp account in waydroid like this.
They have already bought .org and .net. I guess they just haven’t set them up yet.
From my experience, environmentalists don’t like large construction projects of any kind.
Onlyoffice runs in a browser: https://www.onlyoffice.com/presentation-editor.aspx
What’s wrong with forms?
No, it means people can contribute issues and pull requests to projects on other servers. Repositories would only be created on the server your account is on if I’m not mistaken. I believe it uses activitypub internally, so should work the same as Lemmy/mastodon.
That is interesting. WASM seems like it’s just a replacement for the TrueType hinting language (which is already a VM). So I guess it’s benefiting from a more standardised and audited virtual machine.
It’s also fairly limited to what it can do (source):
you can influence the process of mapping a string of characters into an array of glyphs, you can determine how those glyphs are positioned and their advance widths, but you cannot manipulate outlines, variations, line breaks, or affect text layout between texts of different font, variation, language, script or OpenType feature selection
I don’t see how the mentioned future drawing API will fit into that though.
Do you have a link for that, or a term I can search for? I’m not finding anything about it.
I’m not entirely sure how I feel about fonts containing WASM code… It feels like we’re overcomplicating things a bit.
Has IRC been getting many new features recently? It kind of feels like the sort of thing where software can become “finished”.
Haha I read it as “foot bug zapper”, as in a bug zapper you attach to your foot…
and all future commits
Not entirely true. As long as you hold the copyright to all of the code (there are no contributions from other people), you can change the license however you like. The important thing is that this only affects commits after the licence is changed. All earlier versions are permanently available under the license they were released with.
Yes, that makes a lot more sense.
Step 3 is where the issue occurs. The last party to submit their value has control over the output. Any complex calculations can easily be passed off as network lag. One solution I can think of is to pass the values round in a circle, one by one. This would require each party to share their value before they have seen all other values. At the end each party would share their calculated values to verify they match. Probably other solutions as well.
PyQT maybe? It’s a feature rich GUI library. There are also third party libraries for additional features: https://www.pyqtgraph.org/ . I found the documentation pretty good when I used it last.