Donald Trump urged a federal appeals court to throw out the federal election subversion criminal case in Washington, DC, again arguing in a filing late Saturday that he is protected under presidential immunity.
Trump wants the DC Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn a lower-court ruling rejecting his claims of immunity in special counsel Jack Smith’s election subversion case. The appeals panel is weighing Trump’s request, which the Supreme Court on Friday refused to take up on an expedited basis, as Smith requested.
The filing reiterates what the former president’s lawyers have repeatedly asserted – that Trump was working in his official capacity as president to “ensure election integrity” when he allegedly undermined the 2020 election results and therefore has immunity, and that his indictment is unconstitutional because presidents cannot be criminally prosecuted for “official acts” unless they are impeached and convicted by the Senate.
This argument should be laughed out of court. Elections are not under the purview of the President of the United States, constitutionally or statutorily.
I am no legal scholar, but I don’t see any way for a court to find Trump has that immunity but Biden doesn’t. I really don’t know that any high court loves Trump enough to give Biden that sort of power. Maybe I’m wrong, but I hope I’m right.
Remember, SCOTUS refused to indulge Trump’s election denial claims.
That’s always my first thought as well. If the President has criminal immunity, then Biden could order the FBI to arrest Trump and send him to Guantanamo without notifying any courts/lawyers/family members. He could then have prominent Republicans/right wing figures killed in “accidents.”
Not that Biden would do any of that stuff, but he theoretically could. Do any right wingers really want to give Biden that much power?
Accidents my ass, Joe can start hunting SCotUS Justices for sport if they fuck up & find that a President is immune to criminal prosecution.
Don’t tempt me with a good time.
I’d just be happy if he dissolved the current SCOTUS then created a new one with term limits, independent ethics oversight, etc.
Congress could dissolve the Court on Tuesday if they wanted to. Impeach and removal. Not every justice has behaved egregiously enough to merit it, but it’s a political decision anyway.
I mean, not really. The ruling wouldn’t protect him from being impeached, and Democrats would definitely vote to impeach him if he made a heel turn like that. Most Democrats actually value the rule of law.
Law? It’d be perfectly legal. That’s the point he’d be making with his Mossberg.
And even if they are absolutely sure that Biden wouldn’t, they better also be absolutely sure there will be Republican rule in perpetuity, or the next Democrat in office could decide to go on a major revenge streak like Trump couldn’t even dream of. I’m guessing they’re aware of that.
If this happens, Biden should just go: “Ok, I’m president for life now until someone overturns this.”
Republicans will break their necks getting that decision they want now undone.
He could send hit squads for everyone implicated in j6, end his reelection campaign and retire. If the SC rules for absolute immunity.
And a few for certain corrupt members of the SC as well.
Uh no?
I mean, I think uncle Joe is a pretty decent guy as far as US presidents go, but I value the whole democracy thing too.
Woosh
Agreed. I wouldn’t expect a Democrat to do it. But he could just float the idea in public and that should scare Republicans enough to push it through the SCOTUS that the president isn’t immune to prosecution
I kind of want him to just announce he’ll have Trump assassinated the same day if the court rules he’s immune from prosecution. Not really but it sounds fun in my imagination.
This is definitely the legal strategy I would take if I was completely innocent of what I was being accused of.
I couldn’t be guilty of trying to overthrow the government, I was the government! Also, vote for me to become president again.
Remember what this qlown said about those that plead the Fifth?
If the only person who could be convicted of it should be immune from it, then it shouldn’t be a crime. That argument is, in its face, absurd, since the people who crafted the law certainly imagined someone should be subject to it.
Every time he trots out this lame attempt to avoid accountability, this is what I think of (from Lethal Weapon 2).
Links broken.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Trump wants the DC Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn a lower-court ruling rejecting his claims of immunity in special counsel Jack Smith’s election subversion case.
The former president has been attempting to delay his March 4 trial in the case, with his fight over the immunity claim underscoring those efforts.
The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a request from Smith for the justices to immediately hear the case before the DC Circuit had a chance to weigh in.
Trump’s team asked the appeals court earlier this month to examine the immunity ruling issued by Chutkan.
Chutkan rejected Trump’s immunity claims, writing in an opinion that his “four-year service as Commander in Chief did not bestow on him the divine right of kings to evade the criminal accountability that governs his fellow citizens.”
They also warned that, in their view, Trump’s indictment “threatens to launch cycles of recrimination and politically motivated prosecution that will plague our Nation for many decades to come.”
The original article contains 507 words, the summary contains 156 words. Saved 69%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
