Hmm

  • V ‎ ‎ @beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    125
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    When people make a big stink about Apple not implementing RCS I always bring this up. RCS has an open core sure - but it’s lacking plenty of features that people refer to when talking about RCS. Furthermore, the gateways used for Google’s RCS implementation are made by a company Google acquired. Would we be happy with Apple charging cell providers money to install iMessage gateways at whatever cost they wanted, because they hold the patents? No, so why would we give Google a pass?

    If we want to fix this issue, force Google to relinquish their control of RCS and open the standard unencumbered with patents. Require telecoms to implement the standard in full and without deviation or be fined. Give phone manufacturers a few more years to comply and then it’s done.

      • V ‎ ‎ @beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately I’d be running from Italy and well, we are a bit boneheaded at the moment.

        • interolivary@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ouch. My condolences.

          But hey, it’s not just you though; here in Finland we’ve had eg. multiple literal neo-Nazis in the government – one had to quit because, you know, he is a neo-Nazi, but the extremist right wing party he’s from replaced him with a pedophile neo-Nazi – and our Speaker of the Parliament has publicly fantasized on his blog about murdering gay people. And that’s just the highlight reel, it gets so much worse.

          Europe’s a bit fucked, honestly.

    • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      While true, apple remains the bigger hurdle here. They don’t seem even willing to cooperate.

    • dzervas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      my whole experience with matrix is deeply disappointing. devices getting out of sync, not being able to decrypt messages, missing notifications and that fucking mark as read not working are daily problems

      dig deeper and you’ll find the causes of the problems, which are disturbing. e.g. a json string is hashed (however 2 equal json objects can be the same while their strings are very different)

      the only reason I still use it is a room I want to be part of

    • Andrew@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      How it’s pretty good if it’s in a pre-alpha stage? The reviews tell otherwise.

    • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Matrix would be fantastic. Phone number accounts hosted on the carrier’s instance, and can federate with other instances.

      Something like (for an American phone number): @0014204206969:matrix.att.com and have each carrier share which phone numbers are assigned to which carrier in some common protocol so all you would need is a phone number.

  • OscarRobin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Would be goated if everyone just switched to the Signal protocol and interop was mandated, but that’ll never happen unfortunately.

      • OscarRobin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Signal is a means for message encryption, and if every platform used it and then were mandated to interop, they’d have to figure out how to do the actual transfer, yes. RCS is basically this except nerfed and partially Google-owned which is shit.

        • Bram@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is where Matrix comes in. Fully open source and supports federation the way Lemmy does. (Even more effectively, actually.)

  • V ‎ ‎ @beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    When people make a big stink about Apple not implementing RCS I always bring this up. RCS has an open core sure - but it’s lacking plenty of features that people refer to when talking about RCS. Furthermore, the gateways used for Google’s RCS implementation are made by a company Google acquired. Would we be happy with Apple charging cell providers money to install iMessage gateways at whatever cost they wanted, because they hold the patents? No, so why would we give Google a pass?

    If we want to fix this issue, force Google to relinquish their control of RCS and open the standard unencumbered with patents. Require telecoms to implement the standard in full and without deviation or be fined. Give phone manufacturers a few more years to comply and then it’s done.

    • Veticia@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      We can also go the other way around. Force Apple to make iMessage an open standard.

      • V ‎ ‎ @beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s true, but there would be additional challenges. Outside of the US, Android dominates the markets to the tune of +80%. In order for such an effort to have teeth, there has to be incentive for them to comply. They could pull iOS out of the EU market and remove iMessage from macOS if it came down to it. They are already such a small percentage they might just eat the loss as the cost of protecting their walled garden. Unlikely, but a possibility nonetheless.

    • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Seriously. Hold them all accountable. Don’t be pro-google/anti-apple because you happened to give some money to one of them. Scrutinize both at all times.

    • sarmale@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The implementation google pushes for is, also couldnt find any foss rcs apps

      • Tak@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        After a quick googling it looks like RCS is a proprietary standard of GSMA and not open in any implementation.

        Am I missing something here? I assume you have more info than me so maybe there’s more insight on there being open implementations.

        • sarmale@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I also think that, but im not sure, what I am sure is that the Google implementation is not

          • Tak@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Talk about a total bummer either way. I appreciate the confirmation.

        • whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          wtf I didn’t even think about checking if RCS was open source, I thought it was obviously! I was hoping so much from RCS, are SMS also proprietary?

    • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      there’s the part that google added on top, which isn’t open.

      And then there’s rcs itself, which isn’t open either. You need to get a license from the gsma

        • gkd@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Is putting a ! infront of a markdown link not standard for an image? That’s why it’s doing it.

          Lemmy does use some different markdown formats than I have usually seen, so maybe it’s not a standard just the common thing.

          Edit: oh you meant the other way around. Anyway, weird that Reddit used that for links.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google tries to make many messaging standards and programs

    All fail because of mismanagement

    This is supposed to be Apple’s problem?

    • N200L@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google didn’t create RCS. The idea was floated in 2008 and in 2009 the GSM association (Non-profit, representing 700+ mobile carriers across the world) began directing the project. Since then 47 mobile network operators, 11 equipment manufacturers, and 2 operating system companies (Google & Microsoft) have pledged their support for RCS.

      In fact, Google only started implementing RCS in 2019 whereas Samsung has been releasing phones since 2012 with RCS. Now RCS is actively used by over 88 operators in 59 countries with almost 400,000,000 daily users.

      tl;dr - Apple not using RCS is Apple’s problem when the rest of the world does.