• echo64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    And in no other games! Patents aee truely wonderful aren’t they.

    • GreenMario@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      1 year ago

      We will get like two games out of this before the patent expires cuz Rockstar takes 3 console gens to make 2 games.

    • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Or those gigantic multi million dollar game dev corporations could afford to, you know, pay to license that shit for their own games.

      If they can afford to pay the CEOs millions of dollars for their golden parachute as well as their yearly salary, then they can afford that license.

      If you think a game that doesn’t have that is a failure, then both your expectations as well as that game both deserve to fail.

      • echo64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why license endless patents if you can save money by just not doing that

        Greedy ceos is a bad justification for software patents

        • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          1 year ago

          You sound like you need a refresher on basic intellectual property protections and why they are essential.

          • echo64@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Remember when Amazon, Apple, ARM, Cisco, Facebook, Google, Huawei, Intel, Microsoft, Mozilla, Netflix, Nvidia, Samsung Electronics and Tencent all had to come together and form a super group to develop a royalty free video codec because something as simple as compressing and decompressing video was so god damn patent encumbered by people who just existed to suck money out of everyone.

            Literally, every time software is patented, it ends up being used to screw with everyone, then eventually the patent expires ten years after the software was useful, or we have to waste huge amounts of effort to sideline it.

            You sound like you need a history refresher on patents in the software industry and the disastrous effect that it has had in hurting innovation and consumers and how it is dominated by trolls and squatters.

            • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              24
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I don’t know how to convey to you how important it is to incentivize innovation without worrying someone else will simply steal your ideas to make millions from your hard work you did inventing something while they literally did nothing.

              If I make something and someone else can simply take it and dominate the market with it and pay me nothing for the work i did, why the fuck should I even bother making anything?

              • echo64@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Again, look at the history of software patents. Tell me a single time it incentivied innovation and wasn’t just used by patent trolls and wasn’t just a huge waste of time and money for the industry to spend time on.

                I think you are wholey unfamiliar with software patents in general and are just going on some basic guiding principal and I can tell you right now, history has not played out in your idilic description at all and you are just coming off as ignorant on the topic.

                • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  13
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Let’s take a look at countries with no patent laws and compare their innovations that contributed to the rest of the world:

                  East Timor - nothing
                  Suriname - nothing
                  Somalia - nothing
                  Eritrea - nothing
                  Maldives - nothing
                  Marshall Islands - nothing
                  Micronesia - nothing
                  Myanmar - nothing
                  Palau - nothing
                  South Sudan - nothing
                  North Korea - nothing
                  
                  
              • SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t know how to convey to you how important it is to incentivize innovation without worrying someone else will simply steal your ideas to make millions from your hard work you did inventing something while they literally did nothing.

                If I make something and someone else can simply take it and dominate the market with it and pay me nothing for the work i did, why the fuck should I even bother making anything?

                TIL that open source doesn’t exist.

                • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  TIL that morons here don’t know the difference between software patents and copyright licenses.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I cannot see how they can reasonably copyright the idea of having characters remember you which is basically all the nemesis system is. There are many ways to implement it that wouldn’t violate patent, of course it’s in WBs interest to not nose that one around too much

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can try, but WB will troll you in court for years and drown you out on legal fees to prove it isn’t a violation of a patent. So, most consider it not worth it.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dude, maybe you do work on patents and know your shit. But boy are you clueless about the video game industry.

        • ilickfrogs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I thought the man was joking then I saw his smooth brained response below. Software patents are cancer and shouldn’t exist.

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You think that patent abuse is right, and that’s why everyone in this thread hates your comments. You think the system is fine. The fact that you are inside but can’t understand how corporations abuse the system and think others are wrong or misinformed when they oppose this abuse, is troubling. You think we are ignorant or misinformed, but no, we do know how intellectual property works. We disagree and find it disgusting for moral reasons that it works that way. That’s very different.

              • dustyData@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Patents genuinely are wonderful. The rockstar devs are going to be rewarded for their innovation. They will hire out licenses so that other games can use the tech they developed.

                Comment by you, about 5 hours ago.

                they are trying to out Marxist each other

                Fuck off corpo.

  • GreenMario@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hate this. Same with WB patenting the Nemesis system then not even bothering to milk it.

  • MooseBoys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They’ve built a library of small building blocks for character movements. These blocks can be combined in various ways to create a wide range of animations. … Instead of designing separate animations for each of these situations, they use these building blocks to put together the character’s movements naturally.

    This sounds like shape keys, which is a technique already widely used in games and animation today. When you get shot in Battlefield, your character model plays a “getting shot” animation. When your character runs, it plays a “running” animation. When your character gets shot while running, these two animations are combined - it’s not a separate “shot while running” animation.

    Would love to know if there’s actually some novel aspect to this “invention” but it seems more likely that this is yet another bullshit patent approved by a clueless clerk who did zero searches for prior art.

    Edit: Read the patent. Not only does it describe nothing novel, it doesn’t even document what they did. All it says is basically “we created animation blocks and combine them”. The details are just a bunch of bullshit jargon spew:

    attributes can include conditions, properties, events, flags, graphs, values, references, and variants

      • PrefersAwkward@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think this would make it tough to enforce the patent if it’s actually commonly used. If I were somehow granted a patent on tap dancing, its common usage by others before me would probably cause my patent to be invalidated if I then tried to sue a tap dancer.

        Not a patent lawyer, but IIRC, US patent law had some protections for things (including non-patented) that are already common practice.

        EDIT: Clarity

        • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Software patents get away with stupid shit like this all the time. Patent trolls claim they invented a software pattern and then sue everyone who uses it.

    • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      It sounds more like they’re using more fundamental movements than what you’re describing, not running animation+shot animation but more like:

      Both reloading a particular weapon and mantling over a walk require you to lift your arms, so the root movement of lifting your arm to reload an LMG is the same one used to grab a ledge overhead, etc.

      Basically they’re just categorizing movements based on use case and direction so they can string those individual movements into different and unique patterns for individual actions.

      Pressing an elevator button uses the same arm movement as opening a door, which uses the same wrist rotation movement as turning the key in a car, etc. So they just break down individual movements in the same way an LLM breaks down a voice into phonetics to string new words together.

      • MooseBoys@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s definitely possible they’re doing something novel internally, but the details that would support that interpretation are missing from the filing. One of the requirements for patents is that it “sufficient disclosure of the invention so that it can be reproduced by others”. I would say I qualify as an expert in the domain covered, and I have no idea what they’re actually doing based on the patent alone.

    • DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not shape keys, but something more akin to Unity’s animation layers. This kinda stuff has been in games for a decade or so.

  • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Meanwhile at Bethesda:
    Hey look, I figured out how to animate them to look at you! What? Walk naturally? No I don’t have time for that.

  • Tronn4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We need a video game “taco bell” to take on this stupid “taco John patented taco Tuesday slogan”

  • lorez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who cares? Give me great game mechanics. It will be the dated missions with you being always an inch from failure in an open world. Give me another Zelda pls. Or better yet (since I haven’t played it) Horizon Forbidden West.

  • MJKee9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Fromsoft locomotion is already perfect for games. People care about good games, not graphics or realism.

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t know how old you are, but I feel like younger people say this more often than older people.

      As someone who saw the transition from 8-bit to 16-bit to 32/64-bit in their childhood, graphics were everything from the 80s until at least the 2000s. Each new generation was leaps and bounds better than the last; I remember the discussions in the playground being centered around nothing but graphics every time a new console was announced. Nobody talked about the games.

      Nowadays we have incremental updates at best, so now people care less and less about graphics like they used to. Not me, though. I’m still a graphics slut and an absolute whore for path traced games. I’ll play a game I don’t enjoy if it has the latest in graphics tech.

      • Jwmartin0988@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m old and hold the opposite opinion. Those first few generational leaps were amazing. But I feel like we’ve long reached the point that almost any experience can be conveyed with impact.

        I enjoy the new bells and whistles. But these incremental upgrades come coupled with skyrocketing costs, longer development times, and fewer risks. Indie gaming is still innovating of course, but I miss when AAA studios were churning out risky, unique titles.

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Same. The PS3/360 era was the last one where graphics wowed me. The 2 gens since have been incremental graphically.

      • MJKee9@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m likely older than you.

        Edit: why down vote? Were you born in the 60s?

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah but Rockstar won’t using that they were using just standard animations so it’s fine that they’ve come up with around animation system cuz they use their own engine.

      • MJKee9@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I understand their reasoning… My point is why patent a locomotion style when no one gives a shit if the game is shit. I don’t think a great looking walking animation is going to move the needle as to a game’s sales.