• chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    6% of the water is effectively being used by billions of people. That’s pretty efficient versus keeping lawns greener for a few thousand people who insist on using non-native plants for landscaping.

    • DigitalPaperTrail@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m arguing for making all avenues of water use more efficient. I reread what I typed, and I can’t seem to find where I argued against making lawn water use more efficient as well. It’s also why I upvoted the comment I replied to, because of “How about both?”, specifically

      This isn’t a jab at you personally, but I notice lemmy replies in general seem to add in/make up points to argue against pretty often. It’s kinda exhausting to continue making non-memey comments on anything, because it seems guaranteed someone will misread it and respond to what they misread

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m saying that 6% isn’t a lot considering the number of people effectively using that water.

        It’s like when people moan about California having to pipe in water for its agriculture without considering how many people outside of California are eating that food.