I don’t know how in the world you got from my statement “you must be an AI bro” lmao. I was just calling out the plagiarism machine on this post clearly modeled after gabital: https://hexbear.net/comment/7506277
No you weren’t. You were saying that the “AI torture chamber” was an acknowledgement of AI sapience and sadism by the guy who made it. I can see your post.
But it is neither of those things. It’s very premise is a refutation of both of those things, and the only way it could be sadism is if you acknowledge AI as being capable of feeling anything. Which, again, it is set up to disprove.
Edit: You know, I think the problem might be that you don’t know what the OP is in reference to.
So, there is an idea in the AI hype sphere that AI may be capable of cognition, some level of sentience, and capable of feeling pain.
“Danmar” here reasoned that pain is nociceptive stimuli, so he built a bit of code that added “Pain” tokens to the AI dependent on arbitrary stimuli. And he saw that it fucked with the LLM (because he’s added a bunch of garbage to it) causing it to spit out nonsense. QED AIs feel pain. (Danmar was either the one who made this code, or he was one of the first boosters of it)
Someone pointed out this is nonsense by creating a piece of code that just did the stimuli over and over again and ran it continuously. Creating the “AI torture chamber”
He reacted to this by posts like the one you see in the OP.
You come in and say that this actually proves that the “AI torture chamber” person is sadistic, thus agreeing with the premise of Danmar.
No I was saying it’s weird to make a torture machine for something that is not sentient unless you think it is and my link was to refute your accusation of me being an “AI bro” and while I know it was not your intent I am also not a “bro” and would rather not continue this pointless exchange. Have a nice weekend.
I don’t know how in the world you got from my statement “you must be an AI bro” lmao. I was just calling out the plagiarism machine on this post clearly modeled after gabital: https://hexbear.net/comment/7506277
No you weren’t. You were saying that the “AI torture chamber” was an acknowledgement of AI sapience and sadism by the guy who made it. I can see your post.
But it is neither of those things. It’s very premise is a refutation of both of those things, and the only way it could be sadism is if you acknowledge AI as being capable of feeling anything. Which, again, it is set up to disprove.
Edit: You know, I think the problem might be that you don’t know what the OP is in reference to.
So, there is an idea in the AI hype sphere that AI may be capable of cognition, some level of sentience, and capable of feeling pain.
“Danmar” here reasoned that pain is nociceptive stimuli, so he built a bit of code that added “Pain” tokens to the AI dependent on arbitrary stimuli. And he saw that it fucked with the LLM (because he’s added a bunch of garbage to it) causing it to spit out nonsense. QED AIs feel pain. (Danmar was either the one who made this code, or he was one of the first boosters of it)
Someone pointed out this is nonsense by creating a piece of code that just did the stimuli over and over again and ran it continuously. Creating the “AI torture chamber”
He reacted to this by posts like the one you see in the OP.
You come in and say that this actually proves that the “AI torture chamber” person is sadistic, thus agreeing with the premise of Danmar.
No I was saying it’s weird to make a torture machine for something that is not sentient unless you think it is and my link was to refute your accusation of me being an “AI bro” and while I know it was not your intent I am also not a “bro” and would rather not continue this pointless exchange. Have a nice weekend.