• RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    What an awful “premium” brand. They’re the same ones trying for subscription access to heated seats, remote start, or driver assistance features among others.

    What a crap brand.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    The EU should ban this crap as soon as possible, it is clearly a distraction from driving

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is one of those things that might actually serve to push the notion that digital devices (including cars now) should be required to be capable of installing independent operating systems, especially open source ones.

    I’d absolutely require military devices to be driven by open source software. And yes, that’s a security liability, but security-by-obscurity is an even greater liability.

    In the case of consumer devices, open-source access would be a means of protecting the end user from predatory software rife with dark patterns.

  • TIEPilot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    If this shit came on while driving I would wreck the car ans sue the shit out of BMW.

    But I’m not an asshole, so I’ll never own a BMW…

  • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The most amazing thing about all this is the execs that came up with the idea genuinely seem to think people want this.

    How out of touch can you get?

    • _wizard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nope. They didn’t think it was a great idea because people will like it. They thought it was a great idea because of money.