They voted for something that obviously wouldn’t pass? You can have your guys take credit for something when they actually do it, i.e. when you can even attempt to claim that there was an actual victory and not just a symbolic victory.
The issue most important to me is the establishment of socialism, but setting that aside, you’re missing the point. This doesn’t represent rapid movement, it represents a rhetorical shift from a party that needs to sort of pretend to care what any of its supporters think to reduce the extent that they are hemorrhaging support. It is unlikely that the dems will actually “change their position on Israel” to something half-unconscionable until Israel’s condition has decayed so rapidly that the old position is irrelevant, which doesn’t actually represent a change in position because they would still support Israel if it was still viable.
It’s moving closer to our position because we (communists) are taking it over and replacing them. Not because they are moving left. They would not be moving anywhere without the leverage that is being generated.
In seismic shift, more than 100 House Democrats vote to end Israel aid
Both parties are not the same.
They voted for something that obviously wouldn’t pass? You can have your guys take credit for something when they actually do it, i.e. when you can even attempt to claim that there was an actual victory and not just a symbolic victory.
One of the parties is rapidly moving closer to your position on the issue most important to you, and the other one isn’t. They aren’t the same.
The issue most important to me is the establishment of socialism, but setting that aside, you’re missing the point. This doesn’t represent rapid movement, it represents a rhetorical shift from a party that needs to sort of pretend to care what any of its supporters think to reduce the extent that they are hemorrhaging support. It is unlikely that the dems will actually “change their position on Israel” to something half-unconscionable until Israel’s condition has decayed so rapidly that the old position is irrelevant, which doesn’t actually represent a change in position because they would still support Israel if it was still viable.
It’s moving closer to our position because we (communists) are taking it over and replacing them. Not because they are moving left. They would not be moving anywhere without the leverage that is being generated.
Taking it over by running as Democrats, yes.
You’re a fucking idiot
I’m not though. And most people who aren’t don’t share your worldview. Why do you think that is?
Nice sentence lmao
You don’t understand it? Need it diagramed?
Weren’t you just mocking someone else in this comment chain for resorting to personal attacks? Shame on you, nice principles you’ve got there
You think your whiteness makes you intelligent?
What a bizarre question.
You’re pathetic
You’re the one making weird racial comments on lemmy. Seek help.
Ohh a meme! I’m so pwned.
You guys are very immature. I see now that it’s a community-wide problem here.
Btw, what is the minority leader in the congress saying right now?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jul/14/us-military-aid-israel-house-democrats
Yeah, Jeffries voted against it.
Hakeem Jeffries for Nobel Peace Prize?
*FIFA peace prize
After funding the genocidal state for 78 years?
Yes, it was today.
And they still keep supporting the aid to Israel. Why?
deleted by creator