toomanypancakes@crazypeople.online to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agoScience is rulemazingcrazypeople.onlineimagemessage-square22linkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageScience is rulemazingcrazypeople.onlinetoomanypancakes@crazypeople.online to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square22linkfedilink
minus-squarefunkless_eck@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoFirst time mothers can spend more than 24 hours in labor, and the longest ever labor recorded is 75 days. And do you count the first true contraction as the start? the first signs of dilation? or 6cm dilation? or water breaking? If the baby doesn’t change much in the last few days or weeks of pregnancy, is it that different from the baby the moment of birth?
minus-squaresqw@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agofor these rare cases id count birth time/date as the time the baby finally became separate. but maybe that’s naive of me…
minus-squarefunkless_eck@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agosure but I’m saying that’s the cultural part - just because we do that in our culture doesn’t mean it’s any more correct than another method of counting .
First time mothers can spend more than 24 hours in labor, and the longest ever labor recorded is 75 days.
And do you count the first true contraction as the start? the first signs of dilation? or 6cm dilation? or water breaking?
If the baby doesn’t change much in the last few days or weeks of pregnancy, is it that different from the baby the moment of birth?
for these rare cases id count birth time/date as the time the baby finally became separate. but maybe that’s naive of me…
sure but I’m saying that’s the cultural part - just because we do that in our culture doesn’t mean it’s any more correct than another method of counting .