Digital Camo
:kelly:
What is that last guy even trying to say? I know it is some kind of conspiracy theory “gotcha” but like…is he implying that a telescope can’t take photos? Or is he trying to say that UFO photos should be higher quality because of “telescopes”? Or that it is suspicious that astronomers using telescopes don’t take photos of UFOs nearly as much as the public? That last one, if so, he’s so damn close, so close to understand. Why would experts in a field report less vague blurry nonsense? Couldn’t be that they are better at identifying stuff in the sky and aren’t taking blurry photos of the moon behind clouds and saying it is a UFO, clearly it is a big conspiracy by NASA to trick people.
There were more comments talking about the “mainstream media” covering up how the pyramids are fake. The minds of conspiratorial reactionaries are generally not worth the time trying to understand.
I think it is important to understand how people get into that state of mind so we can prevent other people from falling to it and to hopefully help people out of it.
O I mean their specific conspiracy. Understanding why they fall into this thinking is important. Trying to understand the thinking itself is a waste of time. There’s always another explanation they come up with, regardless of any evidence to the contrary.
Like if you take them on a plane into the sky to see the curvature of the earth and fly them to the arctic to prove the world isn’t flat, they’ll tell you the plane itself is a simulation and what we see outside the windows is all a projection. Anyone who stops believing the earth is flat is assumed to have been compromised by the Illuminati. It’s not worth trying to figure out these claims.
Oh yeah, but sometimes getting them into that trap of spouting increasingly ridiculous nonsense can be a good way to make onlookers realise they’re full of shit. You won’t convince the conspiracy guy that they’re wrong, but you can convince other people to not take them seriously and stop this shit from spreading.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
The original Dyson Sphere paper was a joke. Hilarious that people still don’t get it. https://youtu.be/fLzEX1TPBFM
It’s pretty silly. Like the physicist in the interview says, there’s a lot of naturally occurring reasons those stars could be showing what they do. I think they’re just pushing the Dyson sphere angle here to promote interest in science through clickbait.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
It’s always just a dust cloud or something moved in the way
