• patchymoose@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it’s very on-brand for Reddit to announce that they are removing a feature without having a replacement ready for primetime.

    Why on Earth would you announce this now when you’re not ready for whatever is coming next? It’s like they are purposely trying to kill Reddit.

    I’m only half joking that I’m expecting Mark Zuckerberg to announce a new app called “Links” next week that looks suspiciously like Reddit, because this pattern is starting to feel familiar.

    • Varyl@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think if anything they’re just seeing how little the bad press actually affected their bottom line and are deciding they might as well get through more bad press now so that it all muddles together.

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      And he’ll claim it’ll be part of the Fediverse at some point probably, until the regulators get off his back and he can start stealing eyeballs again (which is an unusual hobby but the super-rich are strange creatures).

  • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Good for them. I think driving yourself head first into the pavement is something all companies should try to attract new buyers.

  • Freeman@lemmy.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gold was always dumb. Why spend money on upvotes.

    The fact that people actually ever bought it (and said thank you for it) was super weird to me.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gold used to be a great way to support Reddit covering its server costs back when the admins were focused on sustainable operation rather than maximising profit

  • Perry@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    So they have a bunch of users that have been freely paying them money for virtual coins that you can literally only use to display a few pixels of a gif next to a comment.

    Their absolute genius move towards profitability is then to forcibly stop making these people give them free money and also erase those virtual coins that they spent money on with absolutely no compensation whatsoever. Not even a shitty award or literally anything at all.

    It’s funny, I’m not sure if I should actually be impressed that they are not engaging in any marketing dark pattern whatsoever; they are just straight up alienating the people who were until now been practically giving them money for doing nothing.

  • Candelestine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m curious what their plan to improve the profitability is. I have a sneaking suspicion that whatever it ends up being, it’ll probably be unpopular.

    • LordXenu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why cut off a revenue stream now of all times. Why not just double down on micro transactions

      This has been such an odd saga to play out.

      • Candelestine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think he’s trying to see if, maybe, instead of making one big change all at once and massively kicking the hornets nest, it’s better if he breaks it up into smaller kicks spread over time.

        So instead of replacing the old system wholesale, he takes it down, waits a bit, then installs the new one. See if that helps at all.

        It probably won’t.

  • drumino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think this is a shitty click bait title. Why not include the feature which is replaced in the title?

    But I guess thread creators hate this one simple trick.

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean to be fair the article doesn’t include it since it’s not known what they’re replacing it with. There’s just a small bit at the end with speculation from another site on what it could be.

  • roon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Guess they’re running out of their monopoly money

    Also why does the title of this post look like clickbait 😅

  • deejay4am@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now you can subscribe to your favorite redditor for just $4.99 a month. Get access to premium swag like custom memotikanji you can use in your posts to show off your support! Start an Excitement Bus by gifting subs to other users! Official sub badges next to your username will appear in the comments section of any post made by redditors you’ve subscribed to.

    Also, if you have AliExpress Prime, you get one free non-recurring sub per month.

    • aksdb@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wait, you not only can’t give awards, you also can’t give fucks anymore?!

  • Liome@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Looks like Steve is a big boy, and doesn’t need any help with ruining his IPO.

  • Techviator@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    My thoughts: I don’t care! I am very happy with Lemmy and Kbin, so not going back there, thay can do whatever!