They did the same in my puritanical US state that passed a similar law.

After some light research, SUWS is what I’d go for to trade the first index. I didn’t see a suitable fund for that second for US investors.

annual performance is way more important than the cumulative index performance - net returns, right?

Don’t buy funds based purely on past returns, but a fund because it fills some part of your overall investing strategy. I pick a set of indices as my target portfolio, and approximate it with funds that have low tracking error (returns largely match the index) and low net fees. If a fund doesn’t track it’s index well and outperforms in the recent past, there’s no guarantee it’ll continue and it could underperform going forward. Both indices are pretty new (10-15 years), so I don’t think there’s enough data to speculate about a 30-year time horizon.

I largely ignore returns when evaluating funds/indices, I care far more about fund composition. The top 10 holdings are very different between the two indices you linked. For example, one has Nvidia at 18% of the index and doesn’t have Microsoft or Amazon, while the other has Nvidia at ~7.5% and does have Microsoft and Amazon. So it makes complete sense that they would have very different returns over the recent past since those three companies make up a large chunk of each index and their benchmark.

How does trump play into all of this?

Idk? He’d certainly have an impact on performance w/ tariffs, but I don’t know which fund would have larger impacts. But you said you’re looking at a 30 year investing horizon, so I dont think Trump is relevant here since he’ll be out of office one way or another within that time horizon.

My biggest concern would be transaction fees buying the fund if you pick a EUR-denominated one, so ask your broker if you have a any questions about that.

Fake: anon has a small dick

Gay: Easy to be sub w/ women, hard w/ men, if you have a big dick. Possible, just harder.

It’s not, but there are plenty of crypto scams. It’s not an investment and it’s also not a particularly good store of value, but it is decent for P2P transactions, with some coins also providing privacy.

If that’s not your use case, don’t buy cryptocurrencues. Most people shouldn’t buy them until more places accept them for payment.

More like an oasis.

Some Magic Arena and Descenders. The latter was surprisingly good.

Not at mine. We have board games and telescopes though.

Because left and right are relative, port and starboard are absolute.

3.14.2 would be slightly better, since it’s rounded.

You also need an ISP, which isn’t free either.

If you have a non-sucking ISP, you don’t need a VPN. But a VPN is incredibly cheap, so just lump it in mentally with the cost of the internet service.

It’s certainly gay though.

Right, because the GPL is viral, forcing everything to be GPL-compatible or you’ll have problems. Some FOSS licenses aren’t GPL-compatible, notably the CDDL used for OpenZFS, which is why it has been a part of FreeBSD but not Linux (and it’s available now outside the kernel).

The GPL makes more sense the more “application-y” your project is, but if you want it used more broadly, more permissive licenses make more sense. Yes, the LGPL exists, but there are still a ton of caveats to it.

The code in something like coreutils isn’t all that useful generally, so protecting it with the GPL doesn’t bring a ton of value, whereas a more permissive license could.

I like the GPL and its variants and I use it from time to time. I also like the MIT and similar permissive licenses, and I use them as well. Use the right license for the use case. I think the MIT is fine here.

Eh, I don’t see the issue here. The MIT license is fine for a few reasons:

• attractive to lots of FOSS projects, like BSDs, Redox, etc
• no incentive to embed into proprietary projects - ls, cp, etc aren’t particularly interesting to embed, and functionality is usually better in the stdlib of whatever language you’re using
• increases appeal generally for research purposes

I really don’t see much benefit of GPL here. It makes sense for larger works with interesting snippets of code, but not for small, one-off tools like this.

Command line is the definition of simple. It’s not easy, but it is simple: you type a command and it runs the command, that’s it. Knowing what commands to run is what makes is it difficult, but the interface is incredibly simple.

Why post the same image twice?

Poetry/uv is similar to Rust’s cargo. You specify your direct dependencies in a TOML file and their version constraints and the tool takes care of the rest.

My understanding is that it’s necessary given the current design of the compiler. That doesn’t mean it can’t be removed at some point.

It would be really nice to be able to define trait impls wherever, and it should be possible.

And there’s nothing wrong with that

Agreed, it’s just nice to know that going in to a massive article like this. Are these reasonable complaints, or are they just justifying a new project for themselves?

mlua looks nice. It also does async for coroutines, which is really nice.

Here are my reasons:

• no Linux support - Heroic works, why doesn’t Epic do what GOG do and revenue share w/ Heroic?
• exclusivity deals, which reduces options outside of EGS
• Epic’s anticheat works on Linux, but their own games that use it don’t, that’s a pretty big slap in the face

I certainly want more competition to Steam, but that competition needs to do something other than exist for me to use it. GOG is that, and if they properly supported Linux, they’d get most of my gaming money. But they don’t, so they only get some of it.

Yeah, this probably reads like a Linux fanboy post or something, but I’ve been using Linux longer than Steam supported it with its client, and I’ll still be here if Steam leaves. It’s my platform of choice, and a vendor needs to meet me here if they want my business. Valve did, so they get my money. I honestly don’t need much, I just need games to work properly on my system.