• FauxPseudo @lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      The issue here is that the thing this is a response to is AI. Try to create a different version and the trumpsters won’t get it

      • OpenHammer6677@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sorry but “Annoying trumpsters” is still not a valid use of Ai imho. You can pretty much annoy them with anything, so there’s really no need to waste resources or encourage Ai use for this

        • FauxPseudo @lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s not just annoying Trumpsters. This is a rephrasing of something they supported which was AI generated. Could I paint this manually? Probably. It would take me a week. Probably but by then we’re going to be worrying about nuclear hamsters or something.

          This is a variation of the thing they’re supporting which was generated by ai and shared by the president. Any variation in artistic style is going to ruin the illusion and the message.

        • FauxPseudo @lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s not necessary to convince them. It’s enough to shake them. Trump posted his vision of himself as Jesus. Sub out the main character and some people will realize the thing they are defending is extremely problematic. The character substitution is their enemy.

  • Danarchy@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    If Obama could do this… but alas I fear the light of god left turmp when he raped all those kids

    • FauxPseudo @lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      By pointing out that they can easily see the problem when it’s a person they hate in the role of a religious icon.