I was going to dispute his bullshit but then I found this gem:
And it would generate in the style of that, all consistent with the artistry, you know, the style, the intent of the artist. And so all of that is done for the artist, so that they can create something that is more beautiful, but still in the style that they want.
Dude is literally saying AI will do a better job at creating art than the artist. Talk about being tone-deaf. The future of artistry isn’t a fucking etch a sketch and prompt engineering you fucking donkey.
The future of artistry isn’t a fucking etch a sketch and prompt engineering you fucking donkey.
Definitely not the future of art, but it could be the future of the media business. These greedy suits don’t care about “artistry” and will do anything to save money on labor costs. Unless, of course, people continue to push back hard against the ensloppification of everything we love.
We hate AI, but to be honest we don’t have it nearly enough…
I have no illusions about managers and executives, who have never worked for a living, salivating over the cost cutting opportunity. I was talking more from the perspective of the artist. I doubt any artist would consider this as actual art because it’s the most soulless way of creating art. It’s the rough equivalent of writing about what you’d want to draw instead of actually drawing it.
There’s a few of them. Notably, the guy who didn’t care that AI art is built on the back of copyright violations getting pissy about his AI-generated art not being eligible for copyright.
But more importantly here, I don’t think most artists in the gaming industry are in much of a position where they can stand by their artistic integrity. If every publisher pushes studios into using AI to be more “productive”, the choice becomes between slopping or starving—and most people don’t like starving.
We as consumers are the only ones that can afford to push back against this shit. Our survival doesn’t rely on buying DLSS 5 games so we have the ability to boycott them to send a message.
I prefer this quote
It’s ground truth structure data guided
Nobody knows what it means, but it’s provocative
It gets the people going
I know what it means, but it is using jargon to say something simple to mislead people
‘I Don’t Love AI Slop Myself’
Yes you do and we have you on camera saying that you do.
it’s literally this meme
What a lying cuck. Then cancel all the AI bullshit, put your money where it counts.
Twist: he actually hates AI but DLSS 6 is changing his words in real time
Jensen, you created this. Own it.
“I don’t like crack myself, so I get community concerns around it” – said the local crack dealer, when reached out for comment on the story. “I only profit around the stuff, I wouldn’t want it myself.”
… every single frame, it enhances but it doesn’t change anything.
Yeah ok this guy needs to look up those words
<Beat CEO in the face with a tire iron.>
“I’m not changing anything, I’m just enhancing your face!”
I once got permabanned from reddit for saying something like this lol
Nah it’s ok. This is the games comm, WoodScientist obviously meant in Minecraft.
Obviously!
He literally built the biggest AI slop empire in existence. Fuck his bullshit.
🤡
“You know, all of the AI-generated content increasingly looks similar and they’re all beautiful and so I’m empathetic towards what they’re thinking.”
- Jensen “the Slopman” Huang
If he even half “gets” it, it wouldn’t have existed in the first place.
Yeah let’s smash-cut back 48 hours ago where he told us we were all wrong. Dude is Backpedaling and desperately trying to do damage control.
At the end, he says game devs have the choice on whether it’s used or not. Is that true? Is this a dev technology? I was under the impression that it’s a consumer technology you can enable in your 3D settings like anti-aliasing or something.
The game has to have implemented it, just like all graphics settings.
