not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agooptimal amount of syruplemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square44linkfedilinkarrow-up1266arrow-down19
arrow-up1257arrow-down1imageoptimal amount of syruplemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square44linkfedilink
minus-squareCaptDust@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·1 month agoIf you take the original 16 squares and reduce them each in half, you can have 32 squares. Doctorate now, please.
minus-squarexthexder@l.sw0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·1 month agoIf the squares are half the size, you get 4x the number of squares, assuming you’re measuring side length and not area.
minus-squareCaptDust@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·1 month agoOh hey sorry I didn’t know you went to school for this shit. Fine. you make the waffles.
minus-squarederanger@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 month agoOne square is the optimal waffle if you’re optimizing for syrup volume alone.
minus-squaremoody@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoIf you serve the syrup in a cup, then the syrup to waffle ratio is infinite.
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoWhy even have a waffle at all, let’s drink the syrup!
minus-squarebumblefumble@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoI post this comment quite often, but a number divided by zero is not infinity, so the syrup to waffle ratio would actually be undefined.
minus-squareTheTetrapod@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoFine, as the quantity of waffle approaches zero, the syrup to waffle ratio approaches infinity.
minus-squareKraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoThis tracks because I’m always left with syrup on my plate after finishing the waffle. So I’ve independently verified your hypothesis.
minus-squarecurbstickle@anarchist.nexuslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoI will put you to work testing this theory. Proceed with waffle preparation and delivery, I’ll be waiting, and will provide my own syrup. Please note all waffles are to be gluten-free, as my body hates me and the things I enjoy.
minus-squarexthexder@l.sw0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoI should put “Bachelor’s in Waffleology” on my resume
minus-squareMelodiousFunk@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoKeep it up and you’ll be the next Waffle King!
minus-squarearcine@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoYou can take this to the limit and make a waffle with infinitely many holes, each infinitely small ! It’s just crepes.
If you take the original 16 squares and reduce them each in half, you can have 32 squares. Doctorate now, please.
If the squares are half the size, you get 4x the number of squares, assuming you’re measuring side length and not area.
Oh hey sorry I didn’t know you went to school for this shit. Fine. you make the waffles.
One square is the optimal waffle if you’re optimizing for syrup volume alone.
If you serve the syrup in a cup, then the syrup to waffle ratio is infinite.
Why even have a waffle at all, let’s drink the syrup!
I post this comment quite often, but a number divided by zero is not infinity, so the syrup to waffle ratio would actually be undefined.
Fine, as the quantity of waffle approaches zero, the syrup to waffle ratio approaches infinity.
This tracks because I’m always left with syrup on my plate after finishing the waffle. So I’ve independently verified your hypothesis.
Give this man a medal
I will put you to work testing this theory.
Proceed with waffle preparation and delivery, I’ll be waiting, and will provide my own syrup. Please note all waffles are to be gluten-free, as my body hates me and the things I enjoy.
I should put “Bachelor’s in Waffleology” on my resume
Dr. Waffleologist!
Keep it up and you’ll be the next Waffle King!
You can take this to the limit and make a waffle with infinitely many holes, each infinitely small !
It’s just crepes.