This is my repost of my previous post here. My question WASN’T actually clear enough, so I had to add “United States presidential” to the title. That said, I’ll start by saying I’d vote for Governor of Kentucky Andy Beshear.

  • MimicJar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    To quote Jeopardy host Ken Jennings,

    The “prosecute the former regime at every level” candidate has my vote in 2028.

    Since we’re stuck with the two parties at the moment it’ll need to be a Democrat.

    Mark Kelly has mentioned interest and seems to be willing to fight back, so I’m leaning towards him at the moment.

    But it’s early so I’m open to candidates who meet the first requirement.

  • zbyte64@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Any politician that has put their own safety on the line. I don’t care if they ratiod Trump on truth social or even took him to court. People with far less privilege are showing up on the front lines to demand accountability, we should expect nothing less from our leaders.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    A 3rd party candidate that can’t possibly win because they’re from a non-viable party that isn’t actually trying to be viable and who has zero representatives in Congress.

    Or maybe I just wouldn’t vote. It’s all so corrupt anyway.

    PSYCHE!!!

    I’m not a fucking blithering idiot. I’d vote for the candidate most likely to defeat Republicans/Fascists. So the Dem candidate. Whatever Dem candidate.

    Because I’m not a fucking idiot.

  • Klox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Never republican. Prior to that, whichever Democrat says they will reign hell fire.

    Disbanding ICE, disbanding TSA, slashing CBP, cutting military 75+%, expanding the supreme court by 10+ seats, expanding DOJ for that massive backlog of criminal prosecutions, forcing better vote methodologies, forcing a constitutional convention (new branches of government, independent DOJ, independent science research, independent health), encouraging new states (DC, Guam, Puerto Rico) to join the union to fix Senate proportions, remove electoral college, add in mechanisms for national no-confidence votes, healthcare as a right, etc. There’s a lot more heh.

    • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      You would actually trust a Democrat that came forward like that? We can even get them to commit not being assholes.

        • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          That tactic hasn’t worked very well for the DNC, their only policy for the last 10 years is we are not Trump, despite every other indicator showing that they are.

          • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            great, go vote for the greater of two evils and tell me how well that goes for you. Oh wait, we’ve seen what happens then

            • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              50 years of liberal ‘lesser evil’ has led to where we are right now. A small acceptable evil allows a slightly larger one the next time.

              Your incrementalism gave us incremental fascism.

              • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                50 years of liberal ‘lesser evil’ has led to where we are right now.

                1. they didn’t have 50 years of “lesser evil”. It’s been a mix, also, the 3 government branches have been in different hands throughout

                2. the Dems implemented progressive policies throughout

                3. the dems are not a “lesser evil” they are an “imperfect ok”

                • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  They’ve actually been sprouting lesser evil bullshit for over a century. There is no shade of fascism that’s imperfect ok

    • fonix232@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Getting rid of the TSA would be such a helpful step forward better air travel.

      Most countries’ airport security is to some extent modelled after the TSA, and was done in lockstep with the US increasing “travel safety” via invasive processes. Obviously it is toned back A LOT, but if the US were to get rid of the TSA and provide more lax regulations on air travel, most international countries would follow.

      • Scirocco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        How so?

        I fly enough to hit “gold” status on major airlines, and have seen the transition from the shit-show that was TSA initially into a universally smooth and fast process.

        I think a lot of people don’t truly know the chaos that was pre-TSA screening. Do you recall being stuck in an aircraft at the gate, because the airline had to unload luggage for a passenger that hadn’t boarded?

        For a long time after 9/11 the only airport operating smoothly was DCA (Congress uses DCA)

        But for the last dozen or more years, things have only gotten smoother, everywhere.

        I passed through JFK screening in less than 22 minutes a few weeks ago.

        • fonix232@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s because you’re US-centric still.

          Other countries, interestingly, didn’t have all these issues prior to TSA hardening the screening process post-9/11.

          All those countries and airports, however, upped their processes when the US did, making air travel a chore instead of a good experience.

    • Flauschige_Lemmata@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      You could register Republican, then vote in the Republican primary for the less evil candidate.

      Then in the general election vote for the Democratic nominee.

      Although I don’t think many people are doing that, so maybe there’s a flaw in that strategy

  • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I would vote for whichever candidate that has firm, unflinching, support for Trans, NB and GNC people. Someone who will rescind every EO (with special focus on anti-LGBT orders), return our dignity and sense of belonging, and vow to veto any and all anti-LGBTQ+ pieces of legislation.

    This is of course in addition to abolishing ICE.

    Fat chance of either, unfortunately.