I think it’s more that when the movie came out, he was actually popular for braindead action movies. It was advertised heavily as a Steven Seagal movie, but he was barely in it. It was deceptive. His presence or absence didn’t affect the quality of the movie significantly either way, but it was a ‘huh’ moment in time.
He was in executive decision for like three minutes total, was he really that bad?
I think it’s more that when the movie came out, he was actually popular for braindead action movies. It was advertised heavily as a Steven Seagal movie, but he was barely in it. It was deceptive. His presence or absence didn’t affect the quality of the movie significantly either way, but it was a ‘huh’ moment in time.
I remember being pumped, I saw under siege, under siege 2, ready for the new movie and dead instantly. Shit was a big wtf moment for a 12 year old.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bxzhF7a7sys
Relinking what I posted in another comment. Tell me if you feel moved by his acting.
Dude sounds like Mitch hedberg here lol.
I don’t understand why people hate him in that movie.
The best part of that movie was Steven seagal falling to his death. It was perfect. 10/10.
If you can see him on screen, then probably.