Yes, its juat making news due to the other virus on another ship.

Especually when for an early investor, IPO is passing the bag for something like AI. If they had a profitabke priduct, there is no need to do an IPO. IPOs are a way toncash out, for these tech comoanies, not a way to raise funds.

Its been a pretty common term in the UK from before the rise of anti vaccine conspiracy groups. Similar tonameroca calling it a shot.

AI being used to scan for vulnerabilities should not make a difference. The same AI that black hatters can use can be used bobwhite hat security.

Sure, it makes finding vulnerabilities easier in the short term but the concept of open source makes vulnerabilities less likely in the long term.

This is a bad call which will likely be damaging for them and for the community.

Playing chess with a pigeon analogy is also appropriate here.

I think the problem is less AI and more that we have loaded more and more cognitive tasks onto healthcare staff. Yes, they could manually work it out, given the time but they seek a short cut as they have so many other tasks.

A lot of those that hate AI thibknits making us stupider. I think its more a problem that we are all now required to have specialised knowledge of our role to a higher degree which pushes out more general knowledge. Then AI is seen as a useful tool to fill that gap or speed upthat gap.

The problem is not AI. The problem is AI is being used inappropriately. We should look at why, as well as trying to stop it. Doctors and nurses use lots of tricks and shortcuts to help calculate dosages for patients, based in heigjt, age, weight etc. It would be trivial(large trusted database of drugs and recommended dosages manually checked asose) to have a universal app that is not AI baser that does all that on any phone or computer. The problem.is it needs to be trusted, so not anyone could make one.

Also, with the deal Obama had put in place, there was a pathway to sanction reduction as it continued.

Keepin ai open and away from gate keeping is a good thing. I’m not a fan of ai. I expect a crash. I also expect the technology to stay after the crash and be useful in select areas. I worry that corporations are doing what they can to create walled gardens.

That’s fair but when tories are awful for generations, Labor are centre right at this point and lib Dems are useless and trust evaporates instantly, it limits your options.

We’ll, to many people it was very clear he couldn’t run the second time, given the insurrection attempt. But here we are.

Yes, it’s mainly ground spices.

Tounchosukd check out https://greensfornuclear.energy/

They propose changing green party policy on energy to be more practical than idealist.

When the green party is a minor party, being idealistic is more important. It helps to guide the policy of bigger parties to prevent losing votes to them. When they are bigger or wish to be involved in government, practical reasonable policy is more important.

Regarding immigration, open borders can be the final ideal and that can be in a phased way. There is no problem with higher immigration if there are the resources to deal with it. In fact its a benefit for the host country and the immigrant, usually. Most economic migrants come seeking work not handouts. Most economic migrants work the jobs that locals don’t want to work. It does have a downward effect on wages, though.

Like everything, gradual change to ideal policy is usually the best way forwards.

I think it’s so the person being lifted doesn’t tense, when ready for it. So you kind of surprised them but it’s an acceptable surprise, as they are expecting a move.

Almost like downloading an app…

Race is a social construct, but it can be a useful differentiator when looking at populations. Race or ethnicity or country or origin etc. Whichever term you prefer.

Ignoring race is what has lead to a lot of poor outcomes for POC as most of the data was based on studies of white people.

Yes, genetics likely plays a part. However, it would matter more about protein during early years, than average across the whole population. Once people are fully grown, it wouldn’t matter so much any more. American diets tend to be higher in fats and refined sugars, so,perhaps that makes a difference but emricans are also at the higher end of the table, despite having a more diverse population, including races that are stereotypically shorter.

I live in Australia and I know that here they have to use different graphs for different races for babies for normal height and weight. The most common European descent population is shorter and less sticky than the Pacific Islander populations and taller and more stocky than the Asian population.

Not ham in particular, but high protein availability and nourishment. Not for just wealthy people. For most people. That’s not discounting poverty in any country.

Hence their point about being the best of a bad bunch. Remember the people making decisions are people. A corporation has no soul and only seeks profit. People work for them and can make good decisions and be good people whomever they work for.

There were good people that worked for the nazis. Unless you think the cleaner, for instance of the Nazi headquarters cleaned as a way to speak evil.

However. I take your point. I just think that’s not what is the point of the discussion here and is no different to both sides being bad on politics. It lacks nuance.

Yes, it likely that makes it at least as valuable, but probably more so, given it mattered enough to sell.

The way it is phrased, I think they made a gain of that amount when they sold it. So the value had increased significantly since they purchased it. However, if they bought the equivalent amount again, it would cost the same. If they bought higher quality gold, possibly it would cost more.