• WokePalpatine [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    No it doesn’t because greenlanders don’t want to be bought and every single poll is going to bear that out, while Californians might actually go for this, at least in the abstract. The universal healthcare is a massive jump up in quality of living whereas Greenland under US rule is a massive dripping whatever QOL they have.

    Also, the US isn’t asking to buy Greenland, they’re pretending they’d buy it and then are just going to take it and then not pay anyone anything.

    • gayspacemarxist [comrade/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      California is rich enough to afford our own universal healthcare system. If we wanted to be distinct from the US, we could “just” secede and still have a massive economy and also have universal healthcare.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      One proposal for how the US could buy Greenland is direct cash deposits to every person in Greenland, basically buying their loyalty. Now obviously it’s all bullshit, the US just steals and kills to get what it wants, but let’s entertain this idea.

      If the US paid each person in Greenland enough to get a majority onboard, basically buying the polls, would that actually be acceptable? Because that’s basically the premise here.

      • WokePalpatine [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah? Unless you think you know better than them. Or that they shouldn’t be allowed to receive money compensation. I assume most of them are smart enough to know how short the money will go.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Well then we’re in agreement - the premise of this joke is feeding into Trump’s idea to buy Greenland.

          My point is that it’s in contradiction with the intention of the joke, which is clearly meant to say the opposite.