• other_cat@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Last I saw, Jolla isn’t targeting the US markets. I was so sad! I really want one, it looks like a great phone. I’m gonna put in a reminder to check on them every few months to see if that changes.

      • meta4@retrolemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Unironically, the Google Pixel is ironically one of the best phones you can get to de-Google your smartphone experience. For now.

        • jnod4@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Clown world. They’re one update away from banning that any second you’re putting too much trust in them

    • durinn@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      In my country, that’s a hard bargain, as we need certain apps that rely on gapps to identify ourselves in formal dealings with nation, county and city actors. But yeah, Graphene’s sandboxed Google Play Services would be a good start for me.

      • quick_snail@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I highly doubt a smartphone is a requirement. They probably have an alternative you’re not considering

        • durinn@programming.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          The general attitude is that you are required to be digitally literate and that you have the “required” equipment. Just like many businesses nowadays take it for granted that you have a card to pay with.

  • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Google doesn’t sell any devices that run OneUI, which makes your post somewhat disingenuous… and strengthens your point. You bought the device from Samsung, so you are even more right to be news at what Google is doing since you are not Google’s customer.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The ironic thing is that Samsung is even worse than Google for users’ rights, and has been for a long time.

    • TVA@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s like on my old Nvidia SHIELD, an update rolled in and all of a sudden there are ads on the homepage. Some people were ok with TV/movie ads being on a TV/movie device, but, why the hell would I want ads for content only available on services that I don’t have? If they’d at least only given me ads for the services it knew I was subscribed to, I would have at least been less pissed off since it could have been useful.

      Reached out to Nvidia and they say there isn’t anything they can do, it’s built that way by Google. By no means do I just blindly accept that that was accurate, but, it’s still bullshit that with a basic update all of a sudden the nature of my device was completely changed (imo) and I’m expected to just suck it up or work around it with 3rd party launchers that weren’t as polished.

      Dunno if it’s gotten better/worse in the last couple years, mine died and I elected to not replace it with another Android device.