Lots of people on Lemmy really dislike AI’s current implementations and use cases.

I’m trying to understand what people would want to be happening right now.

Destroy gen AI? Implement laws? Hoping all companies use it for altruistic purposes to help all of mankind?

Thanks for the discourse. Please keep it civil, but happy to be your punching bag.

  • BertramDitore@lemm.eeEnglish
    41·
    2 months ago

    I want real, legally-binding regulation, that’s completely agnostic about the size of the company. OpenAI, for example, needs to be regulated with the same intensity as a much smaller company. And OpenAI should have no say in how they are regulated.

    I want transparent and regular reporting on energy consumption by any AI company, including where they get their energy and how much they pay for it.

    Before any model is released to the public, I want clear evidence that the LLM will tell me if it doesn’t know something, and will never hallucinate or make something up.

    Every step of any deductive process needs to be citable and traceable.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      5·
      2 months ago

      Before any model is released to the public, I want clear evidence that the LLM will tell me if it doesn’t know something, and will never hallucinate or make something up.

      Their creators can’t even keep them from deliberately lying.

    • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
      3·
      2 months ago

      Clear reporting should include not just the incremental environmental cost of each query, but also a statement of the invested cost in the underlying training.

    • davidgro@lemmy.world
      21·
      2 months ago

      … I want clear evidence that the LLM … will never hallucinate or make something up.

      Nothing else you listed matters: That one reduces to “Ban all Generative AI”. Actually worse than that, it’s “Ban all machine learning models”.