• djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The promise of personal devices is results roughly equivalent to what you would see from a professional, just over a longer period of time. Yeah $200 would have paid for like, 3 sessions of my face, but I’d also like for this to be a solution to my arms, legs, bikini area, etc. I typically wax those areas, but have had issues getting good results with waxing my face T.T hence the purchase. Ideally, once I see facial results, I can start using it on the rest of my body instead. I think this will be more economical in the long-run for full body treatment, I’ll just be trading money for time.

    • dandelion (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      huh, that’s a pretty big claim (that it gets the same results, just takes longer). The costs for laser treatments are a whole order of magnitude greater, I would imagine if at-home devices were effective the economics would cause most people (esp. trans people who typically have less money than the average person) to use them and have them recommended - so my assumption has always been that they can’t be that effective.

      either way, I’m happy to be wrong and excited to hear how it goes!

      EDIT: here are some of the things I see being said:

      • that at-home “laser” devices are not laser devices at all, they’re IPL (Intense Pulsed Light) devices
      • lots of people reporting IPL devices definitely helps thin their hair, esp. on arms and legs
      • lots of people saying IPL won’t do much, esp. for face and groin
      • that IPL devices don’t result in permanent hair removal, but puts hair follicles into a temporary dormant state while laser is more likely to actually destroy follicles

      I think this just confirms my impression that IPL results are not likely to justify the cost, unfortunately.