Summary

MAGA has turned on Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a Trump appointee, after she sided against Trump in two recent 5-4 rulings.

Online critics accuse her of disloyalty, with some even calling her a “DEI judge.”

Barrett has consistently ruled in favor of conservative causes but has occasionally taken a more independent approach. However, Trump supporters expect personal loyalty from the justices.

The backlash mirrors previous attacks on judges ruling against Trump, raising concerns about threats and judicial independence.

  • SilverCode@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Disloyalty? The whole point of a Judge is to be impartial and not just vote how they are told to. Otherwise what is the point. Just put any yob off the streets into the judiciary to vote yes to what you want.

  • hddsx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Ironically, ACB really is a DEI hire with the undertone of “unqualified” they use. At the time Trump was either pressured or he had otherwise promised he’d nominate a woman.

    ACB has less than HALF of the experience of any other SCOTUS judge, Kavanaugh included. She was blatantly unqualified.

    • Sibshops@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      This would be true, but all of Trump’s appointees are underqualified, so it’s on par for him.

      • hddsx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Kavanaugh had the necessary professional experience, on par with the rest of SCOTUS at the time. It’s just that he’s so clearly partisan, that he should not have been confirmed by the senate.

        Also, had he had an actual backbone, he would have let the FBI run and finish his background check. Allegations are allegations. People may lie. The FBI should have run the full investigation to see if the allegations had merit or not. But this didn’t happen. Therefore, in my opinion, he is unqualified even if he didn’t commit sexual assault

          • hddsx@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            Well, yes. I’m saying his legal career on paper made him look qualified. What made him look unqualified was, well, (IMO) everything not directly related to his legal work.