• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    When did 'Murica, land of the free, abandon freedom for madness?

    Oh, I got this one! Pick me, pick me!

    Mexico, Samoa, Hawaii, Philippeans, Columbia, Hondurus, Cuba, Nicaragua, Mexico (again), Haiti, Dominican Republic, Russia, Greece, Costa Rica, Albania, Syria, Egypt, Guatemala, Iran, Syria (again), Indonesia, Iraq, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Cuba (again), Congo, Dominican Republic (again), Iraq (again), Guyana, Brazil, Chile, Bolivia, Angola, East Timor, Argentina, Afghanistan, Nicaragua (again), Granada, Panama, the USSR, Iraq (again again), Haiti (again), Yugoslavia, Afghanistan (again), Venezuela, Iraq (again again again), Haiti (again again), Palestine (continuously), Syria (again again), Libya, Bolivia (again), Venezuela (again)

  • Yaarmehearty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    I’m starting to think the same thing, if you go over US foreign policy since WW2 it is almost like the mask is just coming off entirely now.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      I cordially dislike allegory in all its manifestations, and always have done so since I grew old and wary enough to detect its presence. I much prefer history – true or feigned– with its varied applicability to the thought and experience of readers. I think that many confuse applicability with allegory, but the one resides in the freedom of the reader, and the other in the purposed domination of the author.

      • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        True. But in 21st century colloquial speech, a linguist would have to admit that, descriptively, “widely applicable” and “allegorical” are nearly synonymous. But I’m also a fan of the quote, history does not often repeat itself - but it rhymes. So whether it’s fictional history or rough allegory, the end result is the same.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          in 21st century colloquial speech, a linguist would have to admit that, descriptively, “widely applicable” and “allegorical” are nearly synonymous

          Ha. You’re the second person to have suggested that, so maybe there is something to it. But to be honest I’m not sure I agree. I don’t think I’d ever use the term allegory without authorial intent. (But to save repeating myself, I’ll just direct you to my reply to @dragonfucker@lemmy.nz.)

          Or, at the very least, even if you are inclined to disregard authorial intent, there’s still a subtle difference between allegory and applicability in that allegory requires an almost direct one-to-one relationship between the text and various elements of the real world, while applicability can be much more subtle or broad strokes. Basically, applicability is a broader term than allegory, a superset.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          I dunno if you’re just memeing or if you genuinely don’t know.

          In case it’s the latter…I posted a fairly famous quote from the author responsible for the text this community is based on.

  • samus12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    More importantly, why is EU Gandalf supporting so many pro-Sauron leaders when they have USA Saruman’s fall as a cautionary tale right in front of them?

  • prinzmegahertz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    The US is just Helldivers 2 in real life. A democracy managed by Elon Musk and people ready to die for „liberty“, „prosperity“ and „freedom“.

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          You do understand that Helldivers is a satire of America? This didn’t change in 2024. The Helldivers yell about freedom and democracy while having zero meaningful freedom or political influence, and invading other places to steal their oil or murder them for being communists because that is what Americans do.

    • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      We were freed from England. Slaves were freed from slavery. But, no, we were never freed from plutocracy. We’ve made attempts, though. There will always be someone trying to opress. There will always be a culture of servitude because in service of others power is concentrated.

      Although, America has continued to fight for its freedom. Sometimes winning. Sometimes losing. As a result Americans have experienced more freedom than those who came before.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Slavery in the British Empire ended a generation before slavery ended in the US.

        Sorry, but USA was founded on hypocrisy, pretty words about freedom and equality set down on paper by slave masters.

        Everyone else in the world knows you get freedom by voting for it in election after election. Only Americans believe that freedom is granted by deified slave masters.

        • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          Sorry, was your argument the British empire is more free than America?

          Edit: also did you just call the gibberish that comes out my mouth flowery?

          Seek help.

      • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Americans have experienced more freedom than those who came before.

        How are Americans more free than the native people that were on the continent before Europeans arrived?

        Answer: They aren’t

          • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            I said America was never free and you said

            Americans have experienced more freedom than those who came before.

            Why are your acting like you weren’t clearly disagreeing with me?

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Although, America has continued to fight for its freedom. Sometimes winning. Sometimes losing. As a result Americans have experienced more freedom than those who came before.

        Most brainwashed people on earth.

          • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            What books are you reading that you think 1776 was about anyone’s freedom except for the bourgeoisie’s freedom to exploit the working class and genocide the natives?

            That’s not to say the people who did the fighting and dying didn’t think they were fighting for freedom, just that they were surprised when they were disenfranchised by property requirements and laws that favored the big bourgeoisie over themselves. You may remember Shays Rebellion and the Whiskey Rebellion?

            If you’re looking for further reading, The Counter Revolution of 1776 is a good one.

            • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              16 days ago

              You’re proving my point by 1856 all states had removed the property ownership requirement for whites.

              Please, just the bare minium reading comprehension next time you try to engage someone.

              • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 days ago

                by 1856 all states had removed the property ownership requirement for whites.

                The purpose of that was to marginalize the freed slaves and keep the working class divided. The removal of the requirement wasn’t because a faction in power decided it would be nice and create a freer society, but because it gave them further power.

                To quote LBJ a century later: “If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”

                Please, just the bare minium reading comprehension next time you try to engage someone.

                Don’t condescend when you haven’t read shit on a subject.

                • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  16 days ago

                  Do I need to walk you through every event that happened post 1856? Women sufferage, civil rights, this is my entire contention you clod. Just go away. You are not engaging in good faith.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    The USA has been the bad guy since, like, 1952. Hell, it was post-Soviet Russia that joined with The United States back in the post-9/11 War on Terror period. And the Europeans aren’t Gandalf. You are a serf. Bitch, you live in Alsace. You are a peasant. You need to give your fuckin’ lord the grain. Your fucking children, you’ve had 15 children. You’ve never taken a bath. You’ve literally never. washed. your. penis. You’ve never used toilet paper. Motherfucker, you have worms. You are dying. You’ve had 40 children, 3 of them are alive. 2 of them are child soldiers in the Duke’s army.

    Bitch, the greatest thing you can hope for is to die at the old age of 36. You fucking can’t read. You don’t know what TV is. If you were transported into today, you would be the worst gamer of all time. You don’t know shit. You literally probably don’t even know what the direction ‘left’ is. I’m sure some Medieval guy is gonna get mad at me for this, bitch I’ve been to the Renaissance Fair. I’ve eaten a large turkey wing, which the Juggalos call ‘bitch beaters’, which I think is problematic but a funny thing to call them.

    Motherfucker, you gotta recognize where you are, and then you gotta get passed that. You gotta be unemotional. You can’t sink into this hole. You live in the oubliette. Your job is to crawl up the ladder, motherfucker. You live in the HOLE. You’re in the HOLE. You are a RAT. And the rat, when he’s in the hole gets fucked. People only throw trash in the hole.

    You need to eat a body. And you need to carry the plague. And you need to carry a plague around this whole world, that will change this whole fuckin world. And all your enemies will vomit black bile and will choke on blood and will grow boils and die. But only if you get together with your other RATS. And you come up with some kind of super plague, to fuckin end your enemies and…

    End. This. Nightmare.

  • Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    Europe after stopping fighting the most brutal and effective wars for centuries:

    You’re sure you want us back? We’ll be united this time too.