• irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I mean this is pretty standard in all industries regardless of whether it’s a software flaw or a physical flaw in any other kind of product. What’s the likelihood of a vacuum manufacturer replacing a part in a 15 year old product that had a 1 year warrantee even if it’s a safety issue? Sure the delivery and installation is cheaper with software, but the engineering and development isn’t, especially if the environment for building it has to be recreated.

    • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I work for a manufacturer with part catalogues going back to 1921, and while the telegraph codes no longer work, you could absolutely still order up a given part, or request from us the engineering diagram for it to aid in fabricating a replacement. You can also request service manuals, wiring diagrams, etc. Don’t all half-decent manufacturers do this?

    • wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is why a number of countries have laws saying spare parts must be made available for a number of years past being sold. Well beyond what the warranty is.

      How is this significantly different?

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      What you’re saying is perfectly reasonable, but also doesn’t apply here because they’re still selling this router new on the D-link Amazon store.

      If you’re going to stop supporting a product, you should also stop selling it.