• 1 Post
  • 1.92K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 24th, 2023

help-circle
  • People will bitch and moan and scream about this, but it’s free and Gnome doesn’t have the money to pay for it elsewhere.

    It’s a real problem in the FOSS world. Users don’t want to pay, but they’re very happy to demand features or for the devs/organisation to be run in a certain way or for them to spend a shit load on XYZ, all in order to be ideologically pure.

    This is the real world. Unfortunately given their lack of capital, Gnome needs freebies for this, and AWS was offering.





  • I notice you’ve completely failed to address my main point - that the woman in the article said exactly what you said at the start of your comment. (Which undermines your main point.)

    I know what she said, and it doesn’t undermine my point.

    She is acting as if nothing has changed, when something has changed: the actions of the EHRC.

    The law hasn’t changed, but the EHRC is dubiously using the SC’s verdict to push for anti-trans measures in gov departments.

    Why are you still not addressing that?

    I’m glad to hear that.

    Um, ok? I’m glad you’re glad.

    Now are you going to address what I said or not?


  • Yes, I did read the article. I notice you’ve completely failed to address my main point - that the EHRC is purposely pushing anti-trans advice to government bodies and dubiously using the SC’s verdict as vindication to do so, despite the SC’s verdict not actually changing anything.

    I know it wasn’t the head of the EHRC that spoke in this instance, but she is the one who runs the EHRC and what they do/say. She sets the culture. She’s the boss.

    This commissioner is talking in this way (“accept it and get on with it, trans people!”) because it’s the message that comes from the top.

    Like, it’s not a sheer coincidence that this spokesperson’s professional view aligns with her boss’s. One caused the other.




  • The supreme court were very clear that their ruling was not a reduction in trans rights, but a clarification of existing legislation.

    It’s pretty clear that the EHRC is purposely misrepresenting the SC’s conclusion, and pushing dubious recommendations to government departments.

    She’s a TERF that the Tories put in place (Boris Johnson, 2020). It’s utterly absurd that the head of the Equalities and Human Rights Commission is against equality.

    Her contract ends in November this year. I hope she’s swapped with someone more appropriate for the role.




  • Nationalising now would cost hundreds of billions.

    Or, if you went down the banana republic route of forcibly nationalising without any compensation, and ignored the laws that currently prevent that, investment into the UK would plummet.

    Investment in the UK already took a big hit from Brexit, we don’t need to make it worse.

    The government is already the operator of last resort for the water companies. That means if the companies go bust any nobody steps in to buy them, the government takes over automatically.

    I think the government should state they won’t be bailing out these water companies if they fail. That’s how it should be for any private investment.

    When Thames and others go bust, the government steps in and takes over automatically as Operator Of Last Resort, theoretically with a tremendously lower cost to public finances.