• MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    Terraforming other planets would be astronomically more challenging than fixing our own planet and we don’t seem to be able to get our shit together to do that. Even if we are capable of terraforming other planets, it would take many centuries at minimum. O’Neal cylinders are far more likely to work once we start industrializing the moon.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      If the colonization strategy is the Moon then Mars, I expect humanity would have the technology needed to colonize Mars easily while terraforming occurs.

      The problem with an O’Neil Cylinder is bringing up enough processed material to build one.

      • FrogPrincess@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        The problem with an O’Neil Cylinder is bringing up enough processed material to build one.

        One possible solution is a moon base. The moon is full of titanium and iron.

        And then you could launch the stuff out of a weaker gravity well with no air resistance.

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t see the application of an O’Neil Cylinder within the Earth and Mars gravity wells given how expensive they would be to build next to better places to grow crops.

          If one does get built, I would expect it in orbit around Jupiter or Saturn to support activity there.

  • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Bonkers question. Can’t even figure out living on Earth sustainably and you want to talk about doing it without gravity, an atmosphere or an ionosphere?

    • frauddogg [null/void, undecided]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Not a bonkers question, it’s actually totally predictable if you have an accurate read for both the White urge to despoil the frontier, and the depths of techbro narcissism. They just want to be the first to bust their load somewhere new, no matter what it takes, no matter whose resources they have to spend, no matter what they leave behind. Colonizer-assed cracker techbros always leave shit behind.

      This is what the space-age (hwhite) colonizer’s future looks like: every planet now has ring arrangements of dead satellites, empty fuel pods, blown-apart thrusters, and other assorted human-make space junk. Rings of garbage for all nine, dead vessels (crewed by now, long-dead, pressganged “conscripts” [because “conscript” causes less riots than “undesirable”]) hanging in high planetary orbits like macabre baby mobiles, and a still-smoldering coal where Earth used to be.

      I have no fucking respect for it.

      • FrogPrincess@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Only two things are infinite: the universe and Seppos’ ability to bring up race in any convrsation.

        • xj9 [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          As long as there are white people, we have to keep having this talk. At some point they’ll realize that white is a caste and hopefully give it up.

          • FrogPrincess@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            Westerners try to accept that the rest of the world exists challenge: impossible

            Don’t you have a democracy you should be overthrowing?

            • frauddogg [null/void, undecided]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              bazinga smuglord jagoff

              Don’t you have natives of your own to be ceding your land back to, then going the fuck back to Britain afterwards? Settlers are settlers, no matter what white country they illegitimately live in. America, Britain, Australia, France, Spain, Belgium, the Nordics, all of you are exactly the same.

              https://readsettlers.org

                • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  No you’re just a settler brain dipshit that gets uncomfortable getting called out, the fact you are an Aussie calling someone else westerner is fucking rich lmao.

  • xj9 [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I don’t think capital can sustain projects of this magnitude. Space is too harsh of an environment for delulu. We can hardly grapple with the idea that our actions on earth have consequences because of our condition. I like space stuff and I even like to create designs of starships, but I don’t think we’re in a position to reach for the stars just yet. Even if I’m wrong, we can’t allow space fascism get started either. There is probably life out there and if space capitalism finds them, they’ll try to pull another indigenous genocide and invent new forms of xenophobia to justify it.

    None of our problems are technological. We have massive people problems. Building a new billions of dollar machine or trillions of dollar space station isn’t going to disrupt the imperial core. The Gray Techno Fash won’t suddenly become humanists because space.

    Space life can be fun to think about, but techno futurism is a liberal fetish and tends to result in liberal fantasies if you don’t decolonize your mind.

    https://readsettlers.org tbh

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    We should be exploring both options, exploration can often lead to unexpected discoveries and technological advancement.

      • subignition@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        a planetary catastrophe out of our control

        You’re still describing climate change. Science fiction ideas are fun to think about but our own inability to live harmoniously with nature is going to kill us off before any of those problems become relevant.

          • variants@possumpat.io
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I was kind of surprised that comet that’s been visible at night was only discovered like a year ago. Crazy to think that would be the warning time of anything coming to hit us

            • LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              There are black holes that travel at the speed of light. If one were to pass through our astronomical neighborhood we would never see it coming and it would end our existence so instantaneously that it would be like our species and planet never existed.

        • LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          And you have your head stuck so far up your ass you think climate change is the only threat to the habitability of the Earth when one solar flare gone wrong or object striking the Earth or black hole travelling at the speed of light passing sufficiently close could erase humanity from existence and we would never see it coming. None of these things are fiction and all of them are completely within the realm of possibility. Modern astronomy has documented examples of all of these things happening. In fact the leading theory right now is that the Earth and moon existing as they do is the result of the collision of two objects typically referred to as Gaia and Theia. Theia broke off pieces of Gaia and those eventually came together to form the moon while the rest became the Earth.

          As of right now the only thing preventing our species from going extinct due to any of a very large number of astronomical events is luck. But you have no guarantees that that luck will last forever and humanity needs a backup plan.

          • subignition@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Uh, nope, you’re putting words in my mouth. It’s not realistic to worry about mitigating that kind of stuff when we can’t even prevent ourselves from cooking ourselves, and several of the things you listed don’t even have plausible technical solutions right now. Nice try, though.

        • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          huh? why do people have this innate ability to underestimate what we might be capable of? why do you think its impossible for us to become masters of our own genome?

          not getting off this rock means our species is doomed regardless of how ‘perfect’ we keep earth.

          • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            why do people have this innate ability to underestimate what we might be capable of?

            Because we can see what we’re currently capable of in terms of climate change, and the outlook is pretty bleak

            why do you think its impossible for us to become masters of our own genome?

            Because even in the best case scenario, this is dangerously close to eugenics

            not getting off this rock means our species is doomed regardless of how ‘perfect’ we keep earth.

            If we can’t keep earth livable, an entire self-regulating planet that’s been livable for hundreds of millions or billions of years, what are our chances of keeping anywhere else livable?

      • SanndyTheManndy@lemmy.kya.moe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Humanity can easily survive a KT extinction event. Sure, 99.999% of us will die, but tens of thousands will still survive.

      • Umbrias@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        there is not a single thing that could wipe out a deep sea habitat that wouldnt also wipe any space colonies. but i dont see anybody arguing for that, despite being far more achievable and practical. also, there is no feasible way for space colonies to be self sufficient anywhere in the near future, so wiping out earth also wipes out space colonies relying on it for supplies. this argument aboOt survivability is absurd.

        • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          a rogue planet hitting this one would. i would expect a space faring race to want to move not only to the outskirts of the solar system, but possible attempt venturing to a new one. perhaps multiples.

          but go ahead, keep thinking small for some reason. technology never advances dontcha know.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        our planet could easily be wiped by a number of things.

        Most likely by us, while we waste our limited resources on useless things like spaceships

        if we dont plan for a planetary catastrophe out of our control, our species is doomed.

        Oh no, how will the universe ever recover from this tragedy?

  • muzzle@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Genetically modify ourselves so that we can live both in zero gravity (and maybe survive short exposure to vacuum) and on other planets.

  • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m not sure that fitting Earthlike habitats in giant spaceships would make sense without limitless exponential growth. Wouldn’t it be more feasible to put something on the surface of a planet?

    No matter how advanced our technology gets, we are not going to get around the basic constraints on energy.

  • witx@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is this sub-populated mostly by Facebook people? Some of the answers really feel like it.

    • airbussy@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      All these answers are so killjoy and boring. Like yeah we should strive to make our own planet better, but why not also do this? Building habitats on other worlds doesn’t prevent us from caring for this one.

      Plus maybe trying to make a liveable environment in space can give us new insights in preserving the one at home. Like how solar panels have come from space exploration.

      • BelieveRevolt [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Why would people want to focus more on things we can actually do right now and would improve our lives instead of completely unfeasible pipe dreams? I don’t understand.

        • witx@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Isn’t there space for both? Why not try multiple avenues? Why have this negative view on everything? Wouldn’t you say the airplane and the car have tremendously improved humanity, even with all its downsides? Or the cellphone?

          I bet at the time of their inventions you would be opposing it because “billionaires are bad and this industry is going to explore the working class”. Guess what? Yes billionaires are bad and explore people and you (all of us) should be fighting against that, not against scientific and engineering inovation.

          • frauddogg [null/void, undecided]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Isn’t there space for both?

            No. Flatly. You do not get to eject any more human garbage into the cosmos from which we came-- you already have WHOLE FUCKING ARRAYS of busted up satellites and pieces of rockets and a bunch of other more shit floating in high orbit that you have no plans to go retrieve, mind you; fuck would you propose making even more for? Other than the narcissistic techbro flex, I mean?

            • LilyRose1919@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 months ago

              There is no way you are this upset about piece of metal existing on Mars, littering the rocks. You’re upset about something else and transferring it.

              • frauddogg [null/void, undecided]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                It physically enrages me every time I look into the night sky ad have to question how much of what I’m seeing up there is just dead space junk. I grew up considering the cosmos more beautiful, and honestly, more sacred than even the ocean that perpetuates our planet. So no, it actually does anger me that people just brazenly throw around ideas of doing what they’ve already done to Earth to other planets, and honestly fuck you for trying to minimize that rage.

                Are you a psychiatrist? Do you have ANY kind of accreditation or doctorate to make such a call? I don’t know how you got a lemmygrad account; but I can only take it to mean the moderation there really is slipping.

                • LilyRose1919@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  It physically enrages me every time I…

                  I’m starting to suspect it doesn’t take much to physically enrage you 😄

          • BelieveRevolt [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Every industry exploits the working class under capitalism.

            Are we colonizing planets or building habitats in space right now or any time in the perceivable future, though? No, so beyond a fun thought experiment or sci-fi material, it’s not an idea worth giving any serious thought towards.

            • witx@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Right because innovation materializes itself when we want … We just flicked our fingers and airplane, cellphone and others just appeared.

              Who are you to tell what we should or should not pursue?

      • frauddogg [null/void, undecided]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        All these answers are so killjoy and boring

        Fuck you, the planet is literally on fire and you bazinga-assed techbros want to talk about escape plans. FIX WHAT YOU FUCKED UP FIRST.

    • LilyRose1919@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      do you mean moving it around the ‘city’ internally? Or do you mean moving it to and from the habitat?