• starshipwinepineapple@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    I don’t see a CLA so this is somewhat surprising that all ~30 contributors would be okay moving away from open source.

    Unless this was a unilateral decision

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      Apache is a permissive license, plus:

      draw.io is also closed to contributions, as it’s not open source. We follow a development process compliant with our SOC 2 Type II process. We do not have a mechanism where we can accept contributions from non-staff members.

      This was added wayyyy before. OP is making this much more of a deal than it actually is.

      • Fabian N. T.@floss.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        @Aatube I don’t see how OP is making it a big deal. That post is merely stating facts, as confirmed by the company representative in the GitHub discussion. Yes, the project was never “open-source-like governed”, but it was technically open-source software. With the additional restriction in the license it’s not anymore. All pretty theorical, but nevertheless true.

        • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          “No longer open source” is factually true. However, it gives the impression that they did something much more drastic. It would be much better to just get to the point with something like “draw.io forbids competitors for Atlassian integration from using their code”.