ID: A Sophie Labelle 4 panel comic featuring Stephie in different poses, saying:

Landlords do not provide housing.

They buy and Hold more space than they need for themselves.

Then, they create a false scarcity and profit off of it.

What they’re doing is literally the opposite of providing housing.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    I honestly wouldn’t be so upset about a “mom and pop” landlord that is renting their basement or garage (where I currently live…) if they weren’t charging more than their fucking mortgage for it…

    It’s infuriating that I’m paying for their house but I have to live in a garage because I was late to the party and new loans/house prices are absolutely bat shit insane…

    But but “the market!”

    The market:

  • SimplyTadpole@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Oh my god, tell me about it.

    Even when you want to rent a place and can afford to do so, landlords make the situation really difficult because many of them put up places supposedly for rent, but make it as difficult as possible for someone to actually qualify to rent it, since they’re only doing it to inflate their net worth and having someone living there apparently devalues it. It took me over a year to find a place that actually was willing to let me rent it because most others would cook up bullshit reasons to reject me (my personal favourite being one that got mad at me and put me in their blacklist for… asking too many questions about their property???).

    Like… I have money. They are offering a good in exchange for money. I am willing to spend money in exchange for this good. It shouldn’t be this hard.

    • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      I’m in a similar situation. Add disability (which means at least 80% of properties aren’t suitable without serious adaptation) and benefits to the equation, and I’m considered “too big a risk” (even though having me as a tenant means funnelling government money directly in to landlord’s pockets). The polite landlords and agents will play along and pretend to take me seriously before they very obviously put my aplication at the bottom of a pile and never call me back, while some feel comfortable enough to openly discriminate against me, because despite the law saying they can’t, no one actually enforces it, and they know they can get away with it. The ratio of applicants per property are so obscenely out of whack, they can place as many illegal conditions as they like, and people will continue to flock, borderline beg, to be allowed to spend 75% of their income on a shitty little hellhole.

      I realised that I had to limit myself to only applying to places that are at least £100 less a month than I pay now, and even those automatically reject me on grounds of “affordability”, meanwhile my landlord just keeps putting my rent up in an attempt to push me out so they can then charge the next person even more, and I keep paying it because I simply can’t find anywhere else suitable to go.

      To say it’s distressing would be the understatement of the century.

  • count_dongulus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Alright but…there actually is a legitimate service that landlords provide. If someone does not want to own and maintain a property for a long period of time, or doesn’t have enough money or means to satisfy a lender that they will be able to repay a very large loan on that property over a long time, a rental agreement is beneficial. Grad students, visa holders, travel nurses, etc probably don’t want to purchase the property they’re temporarily staying in.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Landlords aren’t the exclusive source for short term housing, and don’t need to be defended in this way. Advocate for and support collective ownership via housing cooperatives. Landlording is the practice of leeching money from the working class.

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      You don’t have to rent from a landlord, you should have the ability to rent from a nonprofit, a co-op, etc. Housing is a human right and should never be about profit.

    • Phegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Don’t ever call what landlords do a service. They do it for profit. It’s not a service.

      • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        As opposed to everyone else who actively seeks to make trades that are detrimental to them?

        “Service” and “for profit” are not antonyms, nor mutually exclusive.

  • NameTaken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    I don’t understand how would a 100% land tax work? If you own a 300k house you’d have to pay 300k in taxes every year? So basically making housing unaffordable except for the ultra rich?

    Also why would anyone build apartments if they weren’t going to make a profit? What’s the incentive? No one would do anything if they couldn’t make money doing it.

    If landlords are bad or too expensive why not move, another building another state another lower cost of living area? Agreed rents are super high but that’s mostly in dense urban areas. You’re paying a premium for location.

    I’m really not seeing any honest answers here about how to fix this problem. Besides the government should provide everyone free housing? How would that work how would you decide who gets to live where? Who gets the apartment on the lake vs next to the airport/oil refinery?

    Like I get it housing is expensive but I haven’t seen anything here that would actually help fix that? Ironically more landlords and more apartments would probably help.

    • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Why not just move? Yeah I’m gonna tell my childrens mother that I’m taking off. Just can’t afford this shit anymore, sorry. Then get hit with the inevitable child support payments that will end you up in jail in no time anyway.

      Just toss all that shit aside and move somewhere rural and shitty so you can afford it! (Oops, forgot to mention that pay is also significantly lower now so you still can’t afford anything )

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Yeah, comic only laugh. Funny funny or else why? Why comic if no funny? Funny pages, comics, funny /s

      Dude, comics can be whatever the fuck you want. Want to make a comic that’s just four panels of an unmoving rock? Still a comic. And there’s no reason why anyone should question otherwise.

      Between this and all the “how is this a meme?” comments. Most inane, useless comments. Maybe, just maybe, it wasn’t meant for you? Clearly it’s getting upvotes

      • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Want to make a comic that’s just four panels of an unmoving rock? Still a comic.

        Sure, except that would be a somewhat shitty comic and anyone would have the right to say that if that’s their opinion.

        Between this and all the “how is this a meme?” comments. Most inane, useless comments. Maybe, just maybe, it wasn’t meant for you? Clearly it’s getting upvotes

        Maybe my comment wasn’t meant for you if it bothers you this much? Just move on bro.

        • dwindling7373@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          Let me help you.

          The comic, as many other do, revolves around the final panel where the character portrayed wandering in a state of frustration comes to the somewhat paradoxical conclusion that landlords, that supposedly provide housing, do the opposite.

          It’s political, but also plays on the relatableness of the situation and has a certain quirky dinamicity to it, with changes of location, gesturing and inbalanced poses.

          Its effect on some people is best summaryzed as “it’s funny because it’s true”.

          • hex@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            It’s 4 sentences with a hard hitting message. This doesn’t need to be in a comic 🤪

              • hex@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                18 days ago

                Oh, I mean you’re not wrong. Let me adjust my message:

                I dislike this comic, not because of the message, but because it is in the form of a comic. Personally, I think it’s gimmicky and unnecessary to put this message in a comic. Though, I understand that the person trying to get this message out might use comics as their main platform, which then brings me to understand and respect their decision. Still, the comic adds nothing to the message, and that was my original point.