• Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    We need to be ready to march in the streets if SCOTUS tries to pull some fuckery. They’re not even supposed to be in the loop on elections. That’s the newly elected Congress’ job.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      We need to be ready to march in the streets if entities like local precinct offices or the Georgia Election Board try to pull some fuckery too, long before the fuckery even makes it to the MAGA SCOTUS.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you’re not marching with guillotines at the ready, there is no point in marching at all.

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Hate to break it to ya, but marching in the streets won’t solve this. More drastic measures would have to take place, and frankly I don’t see that happening.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        On the contrary a massive number of people on the streets is the only way we’ve seen effective change in the past couple decades. Violence has led to protracted conflicts with a low rate of success.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Ukraine is probably the most recent example. Russia invaded them but before that they threw their president out purely with people in the street.

            In Egypt they caused a change of governance that wasn’t a total improvement but was an improvement.

            In Tunisia and Algeria they got favorable changes in government.

      • fluxion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        If SC tries to hand the country over to a lying fascist insurrectionist there will be drastic measures. If they don’t respect the rule of law then that’s the breaking point where we stop respecting their laws. Biden has insane immunity coverage courtesy of the SC so we can start with some “official acts” of removal and see how all this plays out.

        • BigFatNips@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          LARP. Sounds amazing, really. But they stopped respecting the law long ago and nobody has done or will do jack shit about it.

        • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I like to think so, but I honestly think people would maybe protest a bit but then everyone would go back to work and shrug their shoulders. I’d love to be wrong though.

        • basmatii@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Liberals have never had the balls to start a revolution, and revolutionaries in the US know better than to let liberals goad them into anything resembling unified action after the last several times

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Sure, yeah, that’ll be when we finally “fight.” Totally. We’re right behind you.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    If it comes to the supreme court, its over. Harris needs a minimum of a two state win over Trump. That means she needs to pick up one or both AZ and NC, and PA. GA is out because its basically automatic recount fuckery.

    There is another thread about this elsewhere, but way the table is set, it looks like Harris is on track to either a) lose outright, or b) lose at the SC.

    • wanderingmagus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Indeed, citizen #14047439! Have you enlisted in the ranks of the inevitable ruler-for-life yet to show your True Patriot loyalty? After all, his reign is inevitable and cannot be stopped, and nothing can be done! Will your jackboots be shined and your uniform crisp when he is inevitably and without any possibility of resistance given the eternal throne?

        • wanderingmagus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I said if you’re this defeatist about the outcome, why not put on a pair of jackboots and join the ranks of the thugs in uniform? After all, if you can’t beat 'em, join 'em.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Being clear eyed about reality is the only way we can make a difference. Pretending things are other than they are is how and why things have gotten so out of control. It sucks Harris isn’t doing better. I want her to do better. But she isn’t.

            We need to demand better from her on Israel/ Palestine, or we lose this election.

            • wanderingmagus@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              You really think that her going hard on that issue will increase her chances of winning in the swing states? Who would that change the minds of, the “undecided”?

              • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Literally the movement of people under the banner “undecided”.

                Harris isn’t getting shit for additional votes with endorsements from Cheney Jr or Cheney Sr. Her momentum has completely stalled and she’s backslid in GA and NC. She needs at least one of those two states by a convincing margin.

                The uncommitted movement are registered Democrats. Its not some fringe group, but like, the core of the core Democratic expected voters. And they came in between 10-25% of the vote in states where the movement was focusing. Lets say 20% of those voters aren’t going to vote for a pro-genocide candidate?

                So call it 2-5% of registered Democratic voters that Harris is leaving on the table with her position on Israel Gaza. Thats orders of magnitude more votes Harris can get by taking a more morally correct, and a more strategically correct position.

                She needs to drive out voters who are torn between Harris and the couch because. No one is crossing party lines in 2024.

                • wanderingmagus@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Well, I sure hope those undecided democrats feel proud of themselves for sticking to their gumption when they get herded into the gas chambers after the other one wins.