• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      And what, die? I think keeping people alive and preventing unnecessary deaths should be the priority first and foremost. Idaho should be made to improve their healthcare infrastructure, and then we can force them to stay in their state.

      But as of right now, the idea of turning someone down at the hospital because their ID says a different state does not sit well with me.

        • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          So… Nobody should work across state lines… In the “United” states… Doesn’t sound very United.

            • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              If people work across state lines, or travel at all, they need hospital services. You didn’t say it, but a moment of thought would have revealed the implications.

              • ravhall@discuss.online
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                If they are in the state and have an emergency, fine. But anything else they really need to burden their own tax payers.

                  • ravhall@discuss.online
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I’m fine with that as long as states don’t get to make laws that affect federal hospitals thereby pushing people to other states to create an unneeded burden on the out of state hospital.