Russians who promote 'child-free movement' could soon face hefty fine
www.nbcnews.com
Vyacheslav Volodin, the speaker of the lower house of parliament and an ally of President Vladimir Putin, said a new bill would tackle the “ideology of childlessness.”
    • neidu2@feddit.nlEnglish
      2·
      2 months ago

      Contrary to popular belief, you are actually factually spot on. It is all described in detail in soviet-era files, locked away.

      Even JD Vance confirms this, ans I challenge FSB to release any documentation that disputes it.

  • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
    6·
    2 months ago

    Anyone who can look at a human being and say “this is what your just do no matter what because of what parts you have and nothing else” doesn’t see others as full people.

  • LouNeko@lemmy.worldEnglish
    5·
    2 months ago

    I thought a woman’s purpose is to seize the means of production, just like a mans?

    • floofloof@lemmy.caEnglish
      5·
      2 months ago

      Right-wingers reach for these religious or moralistic justifications and laws, but Putin is probably just noticing, like many other countries, that their economy is screwed if their birth rates continue to decline. And yet the planet is screwed if we continue to increase. As climate change eats away at the habitable areas of the planet, the obvious thing is for habitable countries with declining birth rates to accept many immigrants from places climate causes people to flee from. This will help those people and help the receiving country’s economy. Unfortunately the right wing is also too wrapped up in xenophobia to accept this solution. They’d rather double down on controlling women.

  • beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
    3·
    2 months ago

    Putin’s job is to bounce on my dick.
    Fuckin shorty mktherfjcker im so sick of that twerp and everyone who thinks like him

  • Desistance@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2·
    2 months ago

    If Putin is doing it, then Republicans are not far behind. Look for that bill that taxes single people way more.

  • stupidcasey@lemmy.worldEnglish
    03·
    2 months ago

    All living things purpose is to reproduce, that being said, If your leader tries to restrict your freedom’s to your most basic instinct you can probably find a better value with someone else.

      • stupidcasey@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        2 months ago

        Incorrect, you can purposely build things, you can build a birdhouse for the purpose of housing birds, a factory can build a car for the purpose of driving and cells can build a human for the purpose of reproduction.

      • stupidcasey@lemmy.worldEnglish
        03·
        2 months ago

        It doesn’t matter. If a living thing “chooses” not to reproduce, it will not pass on its genes, and that decision was detrimental to the species. As such, it no longer exists. This could still be considered a choice, just a flawed one. However, this has taken place trillions of times throughout history, and anything that made that choice was weeded out. You might not understand your purpose, and you might die before fulfilling it, but make no mistake: you have a deep evolutionary instinct to prioritize reproduction over anything else. Everything else consists of instrumental goals that emerge from the primary goal of reproduction. It is literally mathematically, scientifically, psychologically, sociologically, experimentally, and simulatively PROVEN—to the extent science can prove anything and even further thanks to mathematics.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​