• Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Well that didn’t last very long. It was 8 MB for like six years and then it just went to 25 MB maybe a year ago and now we’re back down to 10 MB.

    I’m surprised they aren’t offsetting the cost by selling all our data to language learning models like everyone else is

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’m surprised they aren’t offsetting the cost by selling all our data to language learning models like everyone else is

      Hah. Hahaha. Hahahahahahaahahahahahaha. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

      • Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just to be clear, I 100% think they are selling our data. What I meant was I’m surprised they’re concerned about the size of the uploads when they could just be selling the uploaded data.

        • Lucy :3@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I am using png. Level 0 compression tho and in 4k (3840*2160), sometimes even 4k + 2*1440p (2560*1440), but it’s already too large with just my main 4k monitor.

            • Lucy :3@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Because it was never a problem. It’s a little bit faster for encoding and decoding, and no service ever had problems with the file size. Especially not my selfhosted stuff. Every service, except discord. As I now have resorted to using Vencord or just uploading most media to Nextcloud, I don’t have that many issues with it anymore, anyway.

              • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                It’s a little bit faster for encoding and decoding

                On the other hand, the time spent uploading/downloading much smaller files probably more than makes up for that, although even that difference might get pretty small with modern internet connections.

              • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Because it was never a problem.

                But you literally started this thread because it’s a problem. And then you spent more time defending your bad choice on a Lemmy discussion than you will ever save in your entire life decompressing PNGs.

            • Lucy :3@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Yes. But in theory it’s still a performance hit, and as I have enough local storage (and typically use services with high limits), and I’m too lazy to change grims config just for discord, I never changed it and used Vencord instead.

                • Lucy :3@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Because even though it saves over 29 MB, it also takes more than 20 times as long. And that’s just on my laptop, 1920x1080 + 2*1680x1050. On my PC it’s even worse.

                  I have thousands of GB of high speed storage, Gigabit internet, but only a Ryzen 5 2600 and a i5-1145G7.

          • tetris11@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            PNG started out as ZIP(BMP) and hasn’t gotten that much better. Use JPEG. The pixels you lose are not worth crying about

            • B0rax@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              JPEG for graphics like screenshots is not very efficient. For stuff like that, png is simply superior. (But not with compression 0)

              PNG is not good for photos though.

              • tetris11@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                why though? The graphics represented in the screen are already squashed and scaled, so you wouldn’t be preserving their quality in any case. If you’re worried about text, JPEG should still be able to handle it under high quality settings

                • B0rax@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  We can ask the same the other way around: why do you want to use jpg if it results in a bigger size and worse quality than png?

                  • tetris11@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    But that’s patently untrue: take this 10 MB example TIFF file as an example.

                    • PNG Compression, max compress (=quality 9):

                      convert file_example_TIFF_10MB.tiff -quality 9 test.png
                      
                    • JPG Encoding, 99% quality (=quality 99):

                      convert file_example_TIFF_10MB.tiff -quality 99 test.jpg
                      

                    Final file size comparison:

                    9.7M Sep  5 13:21 file_example_TIFF_10MB.tiff
                    1.7M Sep  5 13:22 test.jpg
                    2.5M Sep  5 13:22 test.png
                    

                    PNG is significantly larger, and difference in quality between them is negligible

    • y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      “by selling all our data to language learning models like everyone else is”

      I imagine China is using it for free since Tencent owns a 38% stake.

    • gencha@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      They increased to 25 to encourage media uploads to train their own models with. They now have collected enough metrics to realize, most valuable content is below 10MB. Now they are optimizing. They won’t lose anything valuable to them and the users who are impacted might even buy Nitro now. Win-win for them

      • Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        It might have only even been like six months. It was in the little change log pop up during one of the updates at some point