• finley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I was listening to a podcast earlier, and they mentioned the fact that their legal liability may, in fact, be limited because of specific wording in most of their contracts.

    In other words, they may actually get away with this in the short term. In the long-term, however, a lot of organizations and governments that were hit by this will be reevaluating their reliance on such monolithic tech solutions as crowdstrike, and even Microsoft.

    So you may be right, but not for the reasons you think.

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      4 months ago

      and even Microsoft

      (x) doubt

      They had decades to consider Microsoft a liability. Why start doing something about it now?

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Because cybersecurity is becoming more of a priority. The US government has really put their attention on it in the last few years.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I was in IT back in 2001 when the Code Red virus hit. It was a very similar situation where entire enterprises in totally unrelated fields were brought down. So many infected machines were still trying to replicate that corporate networks and Internet backbone routers were getting absolutely crushed.

          Prior to that, trying to get real funding for securing networks was almost impossible. Suddenly security was the hottest topic in IT and corporations were throwing money at all the snake oil Silicon Valley could produce.

          That lasted for a couple years, then things started going back to business as usual. Microsoft in particular was making all sorts of promises and boasts about how they made security their top priority, but that never really happened. Security remained something slapped on at the end of product development and was never allowed to interfere with producing products demanded by marketing with inherently insecure designs.

          • xyguy@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            You’re absolutely right. Everyone will be very worried and talk about the importance of security in the enterprise and yada yada yada until a cool new AI spreadsheet software comes out and everybody forgets to even check if their firewall is turned on.

            But with that being said, if you have been looking for a good time to ask for cybersecuity funding at your org, see if you can’t lock down 5 years worth of budget while everyone is aware of the risk to their businesses.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Contracts aren’t set in stone. Not only are those contracts modified before they are accepted by both parties, it’s difficult to limit liability when negligence is involved. CS is at worst going to be defending against those, at best defending against people dumping them ahead of schedule against their contracted term length.