In Fort Mohave, Arizona, even Republican voters are fighting gas power plants as utilities try to lock in fossil fuels

Over the next few months, the Sunrise Hills retirees – among them many climate crisis skeptics and committed fossil fuel proponents – uncovered a trail of misinformation that appear to suggest MEC and Aepco, which is developing and will own and operate the gas combustion turbines, were at times opaque as they sought to fast track approval and circumvent closer scrutiny. MEC/Aepco “categorically deny” any effort to intentionally mislead anyone.

The retirees organized and began fact-checking and calling out claims about affordability, outages and low pollution made by MEC and Aepco in the glossy brochure and during public meetings.

It turned out that with a capacity of 98 megawatts, the two-turbine proposal fell just under the 100 MW limit that requires a state mandated comprehensive environmental review of impacts such as emissions, noise and water consumption by an expert committee at the state utility regulator, the Arizona corporation commission (ACC). Yet the utility has openly discussed plans to eventually double the size of the plant.

It also turned out that many of the county residents who spoke favorably of the plant in front of the board were in fact MEC employees and board members.

    • CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      Apparently, in the 70s Exxon had a solar division, but they shut it down in the 80s.

      Not only would it be better for the environment for them to continue with solar research, it would have been better for them too. They could’ve had a monopoly on solar power by now. “Bad news everyone! Oil is bad for the environment, but the good news is that we can sell you a solution!”

      Of course, it wasn’t immediately profitable (because research costs money), so they shut it down. Absolutely mind numbingly stupid.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Systems and maintenance are expensive. The one they built that’s destroying the earth is already up and running so they’ll stick with that.

          Sad.

          • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Building solar panels is not much better for the planet right now, and we don’t seem to have an end of life recycling plan for when the panels degrade beyond usability. Not against solar, but definitely against heavy metal extraction techniques currently employed.

            • Optional@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              You’ve got pollution that can create renewable clean energy and pollution that can create more pollution. Those are your choices, and you either have to pick one or go live in a cave.

              Yes better tech is always a goal but we’re in a kind of extermination event here.