unboiled.info
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year ago

research

mander.xyz

message-square
43
link
fedilink
1.14K

research

mander.xyz

fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
43
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    1 year ago

    I do love that flat earth documentary where the guy eventually proved the Earth is a sphere.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      83
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It goes further than that.

      Sargent says something along the lines of, “We can’t tell people about this result. They’ll kill us.”

      The entire film sets up the premise that NASA is hiding research about a flat earth. They are guarding the ice wall so people don’t see it.

      Then they hide research showing the earth is round.

      These people don’t care about science. They care about power.

      It’s no accident that conspiracy theorists and conservatives have a considerable overlap.

      • meliaesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m incredibly high and cannot handle this 😂

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Perfect time to watch it.

          https://tubitv.com/movies/100000939/behind-the-curve

      • spiderwort@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        My cynicism is so automatic that I could never say what you just said and keep a straight face.

  • Im_old@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m saving this and I’m going to use it so much

    • lars@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Save yourself if you wish. They’ll say “well that just means that the peer-reviewed articles are in on it, too”. 🤦‍♂️

      • Im_old@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Sure”

        • lars@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nick Kroll? 😍

        • lars@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can’t argue with facts……. is a quaint old saying that used to not be rhetorical

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dude. I completely forgot that Cillian Murphy was in Inception with DiCaprio!

    • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      This post came back for you…to remind you of something you once knew…

      • Shard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That this meme is not real

        • androogee (they/she)@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, but i heard that if you die in a meme you die in real life

          • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The body cannot survive without the meme

            • hakunawazo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I can already hear the meme train. Hop in or live long enough to die on the tracks.
              BTW: What if the train is my totem?

  • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    This could backfire so horribly when they take that as permission to let all their crazy out.

  • Sorgan71@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve never seen a published paper on how to make meth. I gotta get that info from Bill, and his parents were siblings.

    • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      You must not have looked very thoroughly.

      Here’s one which compares multiple synthetic routes and their impurity profiles: https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.fsisyn.2020.06.004

      • spiderwort@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        To underline the joke : research does not imply publishing. Except among scientists it does. Did I get that right?

  • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Youtube

    • Steve@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tiktok if you’re lucky

      • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Facebook most likely

  • Ricky Rigatoni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    TRUTH SOCIAL ITS GOT TRUTH INNTHE NAME THATS HOW YOU KNOW ITS TRUE AND ITS BACKED BY THE MESSIAH TURNIP GODBBLESS STAY SAFE VOTE FOR PEDRO

  • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The guy who set himself on fire actually had lots of proof.

    Unfortunately the proof is just deranged connections

    https://theponzipapers.substack.com/p/i-have-set-myself-on-fire-outside

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      My name is Max Azzarello, and I am an investigative researcher who has set himself on fire outside of the Trump trial in Manhattan.

      Well he certainly knows how to write a hook

    • Jasonw911@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wow. That was a fascinating look into a paranoid mind.

  • Beebabe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Im ashamed to say I get a visceral reaction from people misusing this word

    • seth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

  • niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Á la recherche du science perdú! Aka “The Sound Of Silence”.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wait, an accent on the U? I thought the participle of perdre was just perdu. Typo? Or does that accent actually have done significance here?

      • jxk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        The correct phrase is « à la recherche de la science perdue »

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah, merci ! I also didn’t realise that it would be conjugated to agree with “la”.

      • niktemadur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oops, typo. My first language is Spanish, I assumed there was an accent at the end.

  • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tumblr

  • spiderwort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I researched the spelling of “research” for this reply. Does this count as publishing?

    • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Slap a doi on it.

  • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/research you should have done yours

  • sazey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Like most published research isn’t unreproducible horseshit mostly there because of name dropping or dollars.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fwiw the reproducibility crisis isn’t because of “horseshit” science. There are a few examples of that for sure. But the vast majority of it is just good science that happens to be wrong. The scientific method doesn’t mean the wrong conclusion can be drawn, especially when for budgetary reasons sample sizes are relatively limited, or when the effect size being studied is small, or there are too many confounding variables.

      That’s not a mark against the studies though. It’s just a mark in favour of attempting to reproduce studies and giving good funding to attempts to do so. And perhaps a mark against using one-off studies with small effect sizes to shape public policy or health advice.

      • sazey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        My critique was not aimed at the scientific method itself nor at constraints faced by researchers. I was aiming more towards the sneering attitude that published research is the only valid method of drawing a conclusion, especially at the person level.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          One published paper is not a valid method of drawing a conclusion. Studying references, citations and related papers is.

    • troglodytis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Correct, most published research is not unreproducible horseshit.

      • sazey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        So it is reproducible horseshit, got it.

Science Memes@mander.xyz

science_memes@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science_memes@mander.xyz

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

  • !spiders@lemmy.world

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

  • !academia@mander.xyz
  • !science@mander.xyz
  • !scicomm@mander.xyz

Biology and Life Sciences

  • !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
  • !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
  • !anthropology@mander.xyz
  • !arachnology@mander.xyz
  • !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
  • !biodiversity@mander.xyz
  • !biology@mander.xyz
  • !biophysics@mander.xyz
  • !botany@mander.xyz
  • !ecology@mander.xyz
  • !entomology@mander.xyz
  • !fermentation@mander.xyz
  • !herpetology@mander.xyz
  • !houseplants@mander.xyz
  • !medicine@mander.xyz
  • !microscopy@mander.xyz
  • !mycology@mander.xyz
  • !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
  • !nutrition@mander.xyz
  • !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
  • !palaeontology@mander.xyz
  • !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
  • !plantid@mander.xyz
  • !plants@mander.xyz
  • !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz

Physical Sciences

  • !astronomy@mander.xyz
  • !chemistry@mander.xyz
  • !earthscience@mander.xyz
  • !geography@mander.xyz
  • !geospatial@mander.xyz
  • !nuclear@mander.xyz
  • !physics@mander.xyz
  • !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
  • !spectroscopy@mander.xyz

Humanities and Social Sciences

  • !archaeology@mander.xyz
  • !folklore@mander.xyz
  • !history@mander.xyz
  • !old_maps@mander.xyz

Practical and Applied Sciences

  • !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
  • !gardening@mander.xyz
  • !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
  • !soilscience@slrpnk.net
  • !terrariums@mander.xyz
  • !timelapse@mander.xyz

Memes

  • !bushrat_confidential@slrpnk.net
  • !science_memes@mander.xyz

Miscellaneous

  • !answered@mander.xyz
  • !mander@mander.xyz
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.08K users / day
  • 7.08K users / week
  • 9.33K users / month
  • 20.2K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 14.7K subscribers
  • 4.66K Posts
  • 108K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Salamander@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@mander.xyz
  • SciBot@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • UI: unknown version
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org