

Which can be ASM in a C raincoat
Which can be ASM in a C raincoat
Lol ok
This is just a link to a link. The actual destination is https://something.fromnothing.blog/posts/dolla-dolla-bill-yall/
The swasticar is junk but showing off cool stuff to your kid’s friends is pretty innocent from nice cars to home stereos
And know how to discern obfuscated code
When are these fuckers gonna get to the FO part of FAFO
Ah tx. Knew gfm wouldn’t allow them for convicted criminals but now not even for accused? That’s fucked up
Is that some temu version of Venmo or GoFundMe?
You can lick anything once
Same thing that will happen today when a car’s computer is no longer produced
Poor swasticar 😥
You have to bear in mind that you can’t trust literally anything he says about literally anything.
This is a self-referential paradox — a classic logic puzzle designed to be tricky. Let’s break it down:
Step-by-step analysis:
How many choices? There are 4 possible answers, so if we pick one randomly, the chance of picking any specific one is 1 in 4 = 25%.
How many answers say “25%”? Two.
That means the probability of randomly choosing an answer that says “25%” is 2 in 4 = 50%.
But if the correct answer is 50%, then only one option says “50%” — which is ©. So the probability of picking it at random is 1 in 4 = 25%, contradicting the idea that 50% is correct.
If the correct answer is 25%, then two options say that — a and d. So the chance of picking one of those at random is 50%, not 25% — again a contradiction.
Similarly, if 60% is correct (only one option), then the chance of picking it randomly is 25%, which again makes it incorrect.
Conclusion: Any choice leads to a contradiction. This is a self-referential paradox, meaning the question breaks logical consistency. There is no consistent correct answer.
HELL YES
Jaime in GoT 🙄
Aww, America Junior is learning from Big Brother