• tory@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    191
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    9 months ago

    Using the term “normies” paints you as having a superiority complex, which isn’t the best look.

    • Evkob@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I appreciate you calling out the use of the term “normie”. Communities that frequently use such terms always end up with an unhealthy “us vs them” mentality.

      Like I’m not surprised people don’t react well to someone bringing up privacy issues if said person starts the conversation with the mentality of “how do I enlighten this normie?”

      • sibannac@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        What’s hilarious is that it becomes normalized by a majority in a community then a minority breaks off once it does and the cycle starts again. It’s normies all the way down.

    • alyth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Really? I just interpreted the use of normie here as “layperson” or “average user” and thought it was completely harmless.

      • tory@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Have someone refer to you as a normie and lmk if it feels neutral or derogatory.

        • alyth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          I can’t imagine normies getting worked up over what some internet nerd calls them

          • tory@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            That’s neither here nor there and sidesteps the point. Also, depending on how you define normies and nerds, it’s a bit silly. You can’t imagine a random person being worked up by being called names online. I mean, okay, if you say so.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      You’re not wrong. That said sometimes it can be self-deprecating.

      In any case, one substitute is “non-nerds”, but I’m sure someone can think of a term that fits even better in the meme.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      I find it a very confusing term aswell because what does it even define? I always arrive on it being a synonymous to neurotypical outside the autistic context.

      • smeg@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The average person, the common man, the everyday user, the casual, the layman. Context dependent, obv.

          • squid_slime@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            downvoting is a form of expression, to label downvoting as disrespectful based on a narrow definition limits freedom of expression and overlooks the nuances. im a democratic socialist so voting is important to me.

              • squid_slime@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                I’m all for duologue, but there is a voting system, its very accessible more so than typing. Don’t you think this is a bit short sited and in reverse should people avoid voting in general good and bad?

                • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  You still haven’t explained why people shouldn’t take “normie” as a pejorative, or why using potential insults is a good thing.

                  • squid_slime@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Weird fallback, I dont see this as relevant to our discussion so I won’t be explaining “why people shouldn’t take “normie” as a pejorative, or why using potential insults is a good thing.”

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It implies them having that complex, thinking they know better than, as another comment pointed out, some nerds.

      You know, that kind of people thinking their degree of social anthropology or whatever makes them smarter than you in every area. Because whatever they are doing is important and whatever you are doing is toys for nerds.

      • tory@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I can imagine a social butterfly looking down on nerds. Although I gotta level with you: that sounds like something that would primarily occur in high school to me. Maybe you’re grown and still dealing with that, but either way: using the term normies is not going to help at all, I assure you.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Maybe you’re grown and still dealing with that, but either way: using the term normies is not going to help at all, I assure you.

          This seems common sense to you, right?

          Well, I, being almost 28, am just starting to realize that you should carefully measure both respect and disrespect, and there may be too little or too much of both.

          Maybe not “social butterfly”, I’m just thinking of all the people thinking they now know what is serious in life. A surprising amount don’t have complex hobbies or even deep cultural familiarity with their own profession.

          And if that profession is more about talking to people than about conceptualization (many typical office jobs), or maybe it is descriptive, not creative (like many liberal arts degrees), they are going to be dismissive of people who actually make things.

          Watching and doing is different, and people watching often think too much of their ability to do stuff, just like with sports or music or cars or warfare or porn.

          EDIT: The point was that sometimes it’s better to be honest and use such means to inform people that they don’t know what they are talking about.

      • tory@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, OP was for sure putting people down with this meme. You’re arguing in bad faith here, putting aside the very obvious for the sake of having an argument.

          • tory@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            And by commenting this, you’re now on top with the superiority complex, lol. Getting to feel superior to both of us, bravo.

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Discord is built on Chromium, which is the main concern I have heard. I’ve yet to see any evidence that they’re mining user data, which is a valid concern. They’ve done a shockingly good job of funding themselves without selling user info thus far.

            • hypnicjerk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 months ago

              They’ve done a shockingly good job of funding themselves without selling user info thus far.

              to my cynical ass, this just looks like they (and their investors) are more interested in being acquired (with their treasure trove of user data fully exclusive) than in opening up short term revenue streams.

            • squid_slime@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Isn’t tencent one of they’re largest investors and China forces data collection from these company atleat this is something ive heard mentioned

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      9 months ago

      Being a normie isn’t the best look either.

      Misanthropy in current times is an indicator of a functioning brain.

      • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’ve written software you use every day. Apache, NGinx, and a bunch of CNCF projects. I’m just as good as you at tech, likely better, and have a full understanding. I didn’t give a crap.

        Opinions like yours are the essence of fedora anti culture that paints a picture of the asshole IT guy.