• @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      124 months ago

      Why would you need an option on the ballot to say you want everyone else to choose a candidate for you?

      • no banana 🚫🍌
        link
        fedilink
        54 months ago

        Look, I agree, but there’s also statistical value to the actual choices in seeing that a portion of the electorate isn’t being heard. At least in certain circumstances. I still totally agree that not voting/voting “none of the above” does give your vote to someone else.

        • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          44 months ago

          But is that statistical value the difference between a valid election and an invalid one, as the original commenter claimed?

          Plus it’s weird to make that the only pure opinion question. If you’re going to do that, why not ask other questions, like which candidate you’d really prefer if you thought they could win, or who you’d really prefer even if that person isn’t on the ballot?

          • no banana 🚫🍌
            link
            fedilink
            24 months ago

            Oh that’s not how I took their comment. I took it as a badly written “if there are no valid choices to me” rather than “election is invalid”.

            • monkA
              link
              -24 months ago

              Oh, the shitshowrunners will sure claim it’s valid. What I meant to say is that it’s a scam. If an election is a way to find out whom does the electorate want to elect, then this is not an election, it’s a voting process. A voting process without a way to distinguish “yes, I’ve researched them all and cared to show up to tell you I want none of them” from invalid ballots, people not showing up etc etc is actively swiping the actual people’s stances under the carpet.