booty [he/him]

  • 0 Posts
  • 183 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 11th, 2020

help-circle

  • Knowing the answer to some of history’s biggest mysteries, because you were there, but being unable to speak about them because, 1, that would expose you, 2, nobody would believe you either way because nobody expects you to be THAT old.

    IDK, I feel like researching for supporting evidence of a theory you already know is correct would be much easier than researching to try to piece together a theory from no information. I think you could put the truth out there as credible and well-regarded theories, even if there are incorrect alternative theories that people also have to consider.



  • My first instinct was A, at the base of the neck. But now that I think about it I think I agree with this more. I think it could be argued that at the joint is where the neck really begins, and that the narrow part beneath that is still part of the body. And I think it would look better (and more professional!) if our weevil friend wore his tie there.






  • booty [he/him]@hexbear.nettoScience Memes@mander.xyzBreast Cancer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I pointed out what I considered (and still consider) to be the most likely use for the tech you were describing, while asking you if that was your intention. A simple “no, actually I was thinking more about another use case” would have been a far more neutral and reasonable response. Instead, you assumed I was speaking in bad faith and responded in kind. You are the only one making assumptions or starting fights for no reason.


  • booty [he/him]@hexbear.nettoScience Memes@mander.xyzBreast Cancer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I just criticized your behavior assuming things, before you know the whole truth.

    I didn’t assume anything. I asked you what your intended use case was and you responded with vague platitudes, sarcasm, and then once I pressed further, insults. Try re-reading your comments from a more objective standpoint and you’ll find neutrality nowhere within them.




  • booty [he/him]@hexbear.nettoScience Memes@mander.xyzBreast Cancer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    My intended use case is to find possibilities how ML can support people with certain tasks.

    weaselly bullshit. how exactly do you intend for people to use technology that identifies ships via satellite? what is your goal? because the only use cases I can see for this are negative

    This is no reason to stop science entirely

    if the only thing your tech can be used for is bad then you’re bad for innovating that tech


  • booty [he/him]@hexbear.nettoScience Memes@mander.xyzBreast Cancer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    5 years ago I created a model that was able to spot certain types of ships based only on satellite imagery, which were not easily detectable by eye and ignoring the fact that one human cannot scan 15k images in one hour.

    what is your intended use case? are you trying to help government agencies perfect spying? sounds very cringe ngl







  • I just looked up the elephant vs mouse segment. The way the elephants reacted, I kinda feel like they’re being cautious because they recognize a harmless lil animal and don’t want to step on it. Like they behave pretty much exactly how I do when I see a little spider or frog or cricket or something. like “whoa there buddy, you dont wanna be under my feet”