Th4tGuyII

If that were the case, and it was something I chose, I certainly wouldn’t mind it anywhere near as much - but the ones being forced upon you by every tech company alive right now are none of those things, and are all data harvesters disguised as utilities.

Fair. But if that’s the case, the last line is over budget with the last “f…”

Considering the “hallucinations” I’ve seen, they’re definitely high something haha

I think AI tools have (and will have) their uses, but AI as a whole has been hyped up so much for so long now that the bubble is bound to burst sooner or later.

And when it does, hopefully we can go back to not having AI shoved into every fucking thing imaginable…

No I don’t want an AI on my phone or computer trawling through all my data for you, just to give me some handy search feature I almost certainly won’t use.

Anyone want to tell him the fourth line isn’t twice as long as the 3rd?

Only if you assume the object was round. I mean it was almost certainly meant to be round, but it could be right ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

If the person who put the dildos there and handed you the condom is asking you to put that condom on one of the dildos, then the person that owns the dildo already gave you consent to use their dildo, thereby you can’t be a raping their dildo. It ain’t difficult.

In the context they’re obviously saying that the other person initiating sexual activity is consent in of itself, ergo you can’t be a rapist for reciprocating that consent.

The same year, the UK government resisted pressure to regulate loot boxes, saying the video game industry could self-regulate instead.

Oh yeah, how well is that going?

Self-regulation is a lie, you need an objective referee to ensure everyone is playing by the rules. Having a referee that can’t punish anyone is as good as not having one at all

Regardless of what you think of Trudeau otherwise, he’s absolutely right here. Russia cannot be allowed to break international law without consequence, as it would show other countries cough Israel cough that they can get away with impunity as long as they have nukes

You’re right that sequels can absolutely enhance a game’s legacy, but they can equally tarnish it ala Borderlands 3.

I’d argue being beloved without a sequel is better than having a bad one.

Alas, we will now never get those three sequels that McGinn and his team had been all too willing to create. But, tragic as that is, perhaps that lack of sequels played a role in Hit & Run becoming the iconic title it is today.

Honestly I think this hits the nail on the head. The lack of a sequel for such a beloved game kept people coming back to play it, and also ensured it could never overstay its welcome.

One of mine will let me do it, on her terms of course. The other bolts if you even think about it, despite being the more aggressive headbutter

The only thing I disagree with here is Win8 being apparently better than Win10.

Win8 was really damn annoying to use without a touchscreen, and while Win8.1 did help, Win10 was by far the better implementation of PC Metro IMO.

Having said that, Win11 is exactly where it needs to be. It’s all of Win10’s worst traits cranked up to 11 with a heaping of it’s own bullshit and spyware on top

Bruh really chickened out on the chance of a lifetime like that?? Even if you lose, you got to 1v1 a billionaire!

Instead of focusing on external threats and concerns, legal streaming platforms themselves could make the most progress by changing their pricing.

Among all self-proclaimed Norwegian pirates, the most common reasons to stop were more affordable legal streaming services (41%) and the availability of a broader range of content per service (35%).

It’s almost like people don’t like paying more and more for streaming services with less and less shows on them, when the pirates will offer you everything in one much smaller subscription (if not for free).

Oh, I’m not surprised at the outcome, I expected the almost 60 y/o man to lose to the under 30 y/o man, but was just surprised to see the stats on just how little Tyson actually did in the fight.

Well this just about aged like fine milk. Far from beating Jake to a pulp, Tyson threw just 18 punches the entire fight. Though I suppose it’s inevitable when Tyson is more than double Jake’s age and he retired years ago

Which is why I don’t think it’ll happen, because the Hague doesn’t even have the enforcement capability to drag him there - nevermind actually punish him for everyhing he’s done.

Man, makes me want to go back and play some Uplink. Shit’s fire!

Well you see, this post is about the ways in a nuanced explanation is inferior to using the phrase “Dumb Fuck!” because it has to be specifically written for a post, can lead to an exhausting back and forth debate where you end up having to write more explanations, can often sound condescending due to the inability of text to carry the subtleties of spoken language, and the length of them can often be too boring to read. Of course simply writing “Dumb Fuck!” has none of these downsides, because it can be copied and pasted into almost any situation, is very hard to debate against, is very cathartic, and loses no subtlety in text versus spoken language.