[…] misses the entire point.

Could you elaborate on what you mean? 🙂

And I hope that you will encounter many more! :)

Thank you for linking the original source! The source in my post currently just points to a Reddit repost of it. I’ll update my references section with your source :)

This is really neat! […]

Thank you! 😊

Thank you! 😊

You’re welcome! 😊

IDK if they’re “Fediverse specific”, but I love SSTF’s (@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world) art.

Neo-neolithic? 😜

[…] sh.itjust.works will fall under the Fedecan umbrella and will share common […] policies

Does this mean changes to the ToS, defederation practices, etc.?

[…] Solarpunk’s Pleasant Politics comm has an automod that bans and unbans based on recent karma ratios. […]

Do they have any documentation for that behavior? If so, could you link it?

Karma does not persist […]

I’m not sure what you mean; if I look at your account, for example, I can see all of your past vote scores ^[1].

Thunder

CMV: Trypophobia should be tagged as NSFW.

[…] i don’t appreciate how you deleted then reposted to spam my notifs.

What? I haven’t deleted, nor reposted anything in this context. Are you sure you aren’t just getting a ping because I @mentioned you in the comment’s references ^[1]?

I think OP is editing this comment ^[1] in bad faith:

• Current version ^[1.1]:

  

• Original version ^[1.2]:

  

Please tag your post as a joke, not real, or similar. If you leave it in its current state ^[2], you are knowingly peddling disinformation ^[1].

Update (2025-03-06T01:45Z): OP has modified the post’s body stating that it’s a fake tweet ^[3]. Imo, the title should preface that it’s fake ^[1].

[…] If you don’t support imprisoning people who hold these views that directly lead to the death of many innocent people, the taking over of people’s land/homes, the destruction of democratic systems, and the elimination of entire races of people from populations, then you are inherently tolerating their beliefs.

To me, it feels like you are conflating some things here: I draw a distinction between how I try to conduct myself (and, by extension, how I think society should conduct itself), and how I think a government should conduct itself. Any common overlap, while it may theoretically draw from the same core personal beliefs, is more of a coincidence in practice, imo. Yes, I think that society should not socially tolerate any of these behaviors, and I think that society should take an active position to socially oppose them; but I don’t believe that a government should take action unless the well-being of an individual is actively under threat.

I could be wrong in my interpretation, but all of your examples seem to simply a be a difference of opinion (no matter how abhorrent and unpalatable an opinion may be). I don’t believe that one should be legally punished for a difference of opinion. The only one that may have some legal ground, in my opinion, as I currently understand your examples, is

Supporting dictatorship, authoritarianism, or totalitarianism as a concept or goal

but that would depend on how you are defining “support”.

I wonder if he’ll make a video (if he hasn’t already) on why he chose to switch to Linux; I’m quite interested to hear what made him decide to switch, and I’m also very interested to hear what issues, if any, he encountered along the way.

Ehhh… if you mean one can port their post and comment history to another instance, then, no ^[1][1.1]. If you mean one can port their account settings to another instance, then yes ^[2][1.1].

[…] If your ideology allows Nazis to face no legal consequences for being Nazis, while you simultaneously state that you don’t believe they should be tolerated, then you hold mutually contradictory views. […]

This is a loaded statement — it depends on what you mean by “being Nazis”.