

I don’t get the reference, can anyone explain?


I don’t get the reference, can anyone explain?


YouTube channel “DPRK Explained” is as good as it gets!

Fdroid has an app called Valv, which is an open source encrypted photo gallery. You can store your sensitive pictures there if you’re on the phone, besides the extra encryption layer it ensures you won’t be sending stuff by mistake.


Estonia being the richest Republic in the USSR (by political decision) and being the “pretty girl” of the Soviets towards Europe apparently only contributed to them being even more anticommunist and russophobic.


Bullshit, though, they were not targeting the entire ethnic groups of Poles, Balts or Ukrainians. Crimean Tatars sure, Germans it’s harder to argue, but those other 3 are literally made up. I loved finding this on Wikipedia:
It is estimated that the NKVD’s subordinate destruction battalions killed some 2,000 Estonian civilians, and 50–60,000 people were deported deep into the USSR [after Estonia’s liberation from Nazism]
So, who were these poor repressed Estonians? :(
Resistance groups were organised by Germans in August 1941 into the Omakaitse (lit. ‘Self-defence’), which had between 34,000[6] and 40,000 members,[7] mainly based on the Kaitseliit, dissolved by the Soviets.[6] Omakaitse was in charge of clearing the German army’s rear of Red Army soldiers, NKVD members, and Communist activists. Within a year its members killed 5,500 Estonian residents
Shoutout to NATOpedia for calling civilians murdering Nazi batallions “resistance groups”
[…] As the Red Army advanced, a general mobilization was announced, officially supported by Estonia’s last Prime Minister Jüri Uluots. By April 1944, 38,000 Estonians had been drafted
Metal Dort?!


China: sets up incentives and public investment on key sectors, leading to becoming the producer of 95% of solar photovoltaic panels in the world
FT: “huh, what a funny accident”


“Consider it like -completely unrelated, different and vital infrastructure-, doesn’t seem so smart now huh?”


“He’s using POLICY to advance his IDEOLOGY! THAT’S SHAMEFUL!”
-Politics understander


Post: seen!


Typically the Chinese ones are cloud connected and either need that to function
Not true, many models don’t need that to work. Maybe Huawei does, but cheaper brands like Deye or EASun normally don’t require cloud connection.


“Secures first place in top 500” it also secured the first place in the top 200, the top 100 and even the top 1!


Unfortunately yes, I never knew that Nazism apologia was so extremely overt


Could perfectly be tbh, I’m not used to detecting such dogwhistles


I interpret working hard as in “from each according to their abilities”. The goal is not slaving away every grueling hour, but for everyone to be empowered to contribute meaningfully to society.
The comment about western leftists believing socialism is paradise is uneducated, Marxism is scientific and not utopian, everyone understands that, for the time being, people work.


Shit, I never even knew about the “clean Wehrmacht” myth… That’s absolutely bonkers


I feel like I’m going insane whenever I hear takes like this. Like, how does any leftist outside Cuba believe that they understand the economic situation of Cuba better than Cubans themselves?? I’ve said this to many people and they reply “we should criticise everything”, and I fully agree, but what makes you believe that your criticism is on solid ground compared to the knowledge of their economy of the revolution that has withstood 70 years of siege 20km away from the USA?


The material and historical conditions are not the same


shows something which literally happened today
“THIS IS WHAT THE GOMMUNISTS TOOK FROM US”
Lmfao thanks for the drama