Calm down there, Posadas…

Yeah, the first time the press core deigned to call him “presidential” was when he launched rockets at Syria. The second time was when he assassinated Suleimani.

The first recorded modern proposal for the use of chemical warfare was made by Lyon Playfair

Hmmm…

Yup. Pronounced “fa-gott” or “fa-goh”.

This is a very interesting idea. It would certainly explain why people seem to constantly “infill” everything everone says with whatever gets them the most angry - the algo feeds them ragebait, so that’s what they see.

Rogue from whom? Ireland? Because they don’t seem to be nearly as isolated as anyone else would be for doing what they are.

“It’s not piracy, it’s federated backups!”

Consider it backwards: Israel sees this attack happening so valuable, that they were willing to forego using the pagers for spying.

No, it’s from a news graphic giving a detailed, annotated breakdown of the “compound” he was hiding in, the compound being an actual, literal hole in the ground, but presented as if explaining some piece of high-tech military hardware, with Saddam himself presented as if he were a component.

For a good reason, quite a number of these are wrong.

• I’ll have you know I was, and still am, probably, the greatest swordsman in all of-
• BREAKBREAKBREAK ENEMY TANK FORWARD GUNNER LOAD SABOT!

Unfortunately, instead, they switched to LNG.

Exactly what i said in the first place - “ITT: a disturbing but unsurprising amount of people who think war crimes are good when the good guys do them.”

See, you start making a valid argument, but can’t even make it to the end of the sentence before you stop pretending. Here, let me help you:

Uhm… if he dresses like a soldier, moves with the troops and is in no way distinguishable from the hordes of orcs that have to die other soldiers*, he is a valid target the drone operator cannot be held responsible for not distinguishing him.

Wearing camo is not enough to make you a target, even having a weapon doesn’t necessarily make you a target. The responsibility of keeping civilians safe is not on the defender, it’s on both sides. The take that doesn’t defend warcrimes is that his death is an unfortunate accident caused by his failure to wear appropriate markings. Instead, the thread has his face crossed out as if he was on a hitlist.

Like, I get it. You finally have an outlet for your repressed chauvinism that won’t get you called racist and you’re letting yourself blow off some steam. But for fucks sake have some decorum about it, you’re acting like Americans.

ITT: a disturbing but unsurprising amount of people who think war crimes are good when the good guys do them.

How about we just kill everyone you, personally, find annoying, would that work?

You know, all things aside, it’s kinda sad people don’t even remember anymore that the Nazis weren’t just after Jews.

Four lawyers, MBA, and an alleged economist. Sounds about right.

You seem to be mistaking universities for vocational schools.

Funny, works with “The Israelis entered…” too.