Options:

• Just start it from the terminal with torsocks
• Use application-specific proxy settings
• Since torsocks simply uses LD_PRELOAD, you could try to make this apply globally by adding the torsocks library to ld.so.preload. Just put the path returned by torsocks show in /etc/ld.so.preload.

Either use the --proxy option of yt-dlp, or use torsocks to transparently torify any application.

fn foo(x: i32) {
    match x {
        const { 3.pow(3) } => println!("three cubed"),
        _ => {}
    }
}

But it looks like inline_const_pat is still unstable, only inline_const in expression position is now stabilized.

It’s because it has to work in pattern contexts as well, which are not expressions.

You can give chisel a try. It tunnels all traffic over http/https, and the client can then create port forwards, just as with ssh, to access other services.

Yes, for example, syncing on a kernel panic could lead to data corruption (which is why we don’t do that). For the same reason REISUB is not recommended anymore: The default advice for a locked-up system should be SysRq B.

Try perhaps the solution in https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/648084/docker-interface-tears-down-wifi-internet

Try removing all the superfluous default routes.

I think glider can do this, with -strategy rr (Round Robin mode). I have not used it in this way myself, so you might need to experiment a little. Proxychains can also do this, but it doesn’t present a socks5 interface itself (it uses LD_PRELOAD, so it won’t work everywhere).

Argon2id (cryptsetup default) and Argon2i PBKDFs are not supported (GRUB bug #59409), only PBKDF2 is.

There is this patch, although I have not tested it myself. There is always cryptsetup luksAddKey --pbkdf pbkdf2.

GRUB works just fine with LUKS2 these days. There is no need to switch bootloaders.

This seems right and exactly the way I’ve set it up. On subvolid=5 I have subvolumes @ and @home, in /etc/fstab I mount / as subvol=@, and /home as subvol=@home.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10602504/how-does-user-js-work-in-firefox-in-detail:

It just looks like a JavaScript file. Once upon a time in Netscape 3 and maybe 4 it actually was, but now it’s just a file with a .js extension and a very restricted syntax that’s parsed by a separate (non-JS) parser and not executed in any way.

Could you run sudo lshw -C network and post the output for the wireless interface?

Cataclysm: Dark Days Ahead

Here is a config template to run an obfs4 bridge, make changes as required:

BridgeRelay 1

# Replace "TODO1" with a Tor port of your choice.
# This port must be externally reachable.
# Avoid port 9001 because it's commonly associated with Tor and censors may be scanning the Internet for this port.
ORPort TODO1

ServerTransportPlugin obfs4 exec /usr/bin/obfs4proxy

# Replace "TODO2" with an obfs4 port of your choice.
# This port must be externally reachable and must be different from the one specified for ORPort.
# Avoid port 9001 because it's commonly associated with Tor and censors may be scanning the Internet for this port.
ServerTransportListenAddr obfs4 0.0.0.0:TODO2

# Local communication port between Tor and obfs4.  Always set this to "auto".
# "Ext" means "extended", not "external".  Don't try to set a specific port number, nor listen on 0.0.0.0.
ExtORPort auto

# Replace "" with your email address so we can contact you if there are problems with your bridge.
# This is optional but encouraged.
ContactInfo 

# Pick a nickname that you like for your bridge.  This is optional.
Nickname PickANickname

You can also use the reachability test to check if everything is configured correctly. If it is reachable and bootstrapping reaches 100% you should be set.

Set SocksPort if you want to connect your browser (don’t confuse this with ORPort). Default is localhost:9050.

I’m not on NixOS, but I have a decent working knowledge of Tor.

Not quite clear on what you’re trying to do, are you trying to run a relay, or just connecting to the Tor network and pointing your browser to the socks proxy?

Arti (the official Tor implementation in Rust) is not a complete replacement for the Tor C implementation yet. Hidden service support is disabled by default (due to the lack of a security feature that could allow guard discovery attacks), and bridges don’t work either. If you don’t understand Tor very well stick with the old router.

But you can do this.

Indeed. This works because direct connections to the tor network are easily censored, but WebRTC is not (not without a lot of collateral damage at least).

The snowflake proxy acts as a bridge to the tor network at the entry side. If by repercussions you mean risk of exit-node traffic, there are none. It might cost a little bit of bandwidth.