From my study no, his knowledge and understanding didn’t change in any way as far as I know. His basic of technology being independent of humanity always remained a basic foundation and no additions were added to it. It just seemed he started doing more and more meth so he just started talking about weirder and weirder tech.
In my study I didn’t feel much break as much as I felt breaks in different philosophers like Satre, Kierkegaard, and others. I will give example of Satre since I know him the best, Satre had a break in from Transcendance of Ego and Search for a Method to Critique of Dialectical Reason and onwards until Situations IV. Clear differences emerge in the way he uses existentialism originally being closure to Communism later being more of a CIA puppet, very oversimplified but yea.
Hasn’t Nick Land changed quite a bit too? Not necessarily to the better.
From my study no, his knowledge and understanding didn’t change in any way as far as I know. His basic of technology being independent of humanity always remained a basic foundation and no additions were added to it. It just seemed he started doing more and more meth so he just started talking about weirder and weirder tech.
I’d say there is a break between Fanged Noumena (on speed) and Outsideness (on dark enlightenment) but I haven’t read much of either.
In my study I didn’t feel much break as much as I felt breaks in different philosophers like Satre, Kierkegaard, and others. I will give example of Satre since I know him the best, Satre had a break in from Transcendance of Ego and Search for a Method to Critique of Dialectical Reason and onwards until Situations IV. Clear differences emerge in the way he uses existentialism originally being closure to Communism later being more of a CIA puppet, very oversimplified but yea.