• ClathrateG [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      19 days ago

      Those aren’t mutally exclusive properties, she’s both. She was adopted from her birth place of Sri Lanka by Swiss parents, but the adoption aspect doesn’t negate that she physically migrated from Sri Lanka to Switzerland and is thus also a migrant

      • pancake@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        I can share that logic, but I had this discussion with someone else that convinced me of the opposite. The rationale is that in most places adoption doesn’t have the same legal status as migration, plus the overal experience, difficulties, privileges or lack thereof, are very different in either case. She may or may not consider herself a migrant, so a more neutral wording like “a wife from Sri Lanka” would be more appropriate.

        • ClathrateG [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          Yes different nations all have their own pedantic legalese on what constitutes a ‘migrant’ but if someone physically moves from one country to another long-term they are objectively a migrant

          Here’s a dictionary definition of the term:

          A migrant is any person who moves away from their usual place of residence, either across an international border or within their own country, to live somewhere else

          i.e. one who has migrated(Migrated is the past tense and past participle of the verb migrate, meaning to move from one place or region to another)